It also took EQ 5 years or so to get to that point and without buying the majority of the expansions (All 8 of them if you want to play with your friends wherever they go) in addition to the main game, you don't really have that much to play (And you're stuck with 1998 graphics). Add to that the first years of EQ had so many critical problems that it makes Ryzom's issues seem heavenly in comparison.thantos wrote:Yeah, I remember that. I played a 65 Shaman and got the first ever SLOW to land on Mithaniel Marr too... we found some great enjoyment in the complexity of those events.
I do not see any way to compare the two other than they are MMORPG. While I am done with EQ, I must say...it had immense content, questing, upgrading, exploration and one could solo exclusivly without ever needing a guild.
Areas of non-aggro in nearly every zone allowed an affliction based player to "Kite" or "Quad" depending on class.
Dungeons, Planes, vast swamps and expanses...High levels, low levels... it fit all types of players.
In comparison... SoR is less expansive and losing the interest of those who want to solo or explore...
Take my word for it, i've played EQ since early 1998.
So no, EQ is not a good game to compare Ryzom to. It would be like comparing a zombie to an angel.