[DOWNTIME] Patch on Tuesday
Re: [DOWNTIME] Patch on Tuesday
So there you are DT, min thresh was only just breached..Woodburn has a threshold of 6 not 5, but only because that what was needed to pass it over.
Re: [DOWNTIME] Patch on Tuesday
ooook
so after the all snide remarks and pathetic stabs at certain players/guilds ect other players have made in this thread, could we get some info on how sucsessfull the patch actually was??
i for one actually care about RYZOM.
Any CSR that can report on if the patch is showing signs of being "stable" this time round?
im very happy that it has been redone as many of the new features are awesome
any additions? andthing missing?
ie the team loot being shown in sys info for example, that still there?
any openess from GF about developments is allways aprreciated(and hoped for
). 
so after the all snide remarks and pathetic stabs at certain players/guilds ect other players have made in this thread, could we get some info on how sucsessfull the patch actually was??
i for one actually care about RYZOM.
Any CSR that can report on if the patch is showing signs of being "stable" this time round?
im very happy that it has been redone as many of the new features are awesome

any additions? andthing missing?
ie the team loot being shown in sys info for example, that still there?
any openess from GF about developments is allways aprreciated(and hoped for


DOOMSDAY CAME =( =(
Re: [DOWNTIME] Patch on Tuesday
Returning an outpost to another guild is one thing. Using friendly declarations to block all attacks on your outpost while simultaneously attacking other guild's outposts is another. What is next? Block all Kamist outposts with friendly trades while attacking all Karavan outposts? Clearly if exploitive behavior reaches that level, the devs will have to step in.great83 wrote:Hmm what false blocking attacks? If you see a guild honoring a old deal of returning a outpost as false blocking attacks then you are really close minded... I thought you were a bit better then that
Then for hissy fit attacks? While turn out to them and see how much of a hissy fit they are or if they are serious attacks![]()
High Officer of Aeden Artisans
Re: [DOWNTIME] Patch on Tuesday
No offence but you dont know what your talking about, the hand over of the outpost was planned before all other attacks, if they wanted to stop karavan attacks then why not put the threshold up to 20+ when handing it back, the outposts have been handed back at the thresholds they where traded to in the first place (a grand old threshold of 6).riveit wrote:Returning an outpost to another guild is one thing. Using friendly declarations to block all attacks on your outpost while simultaneously attacking other guild's outposts is another. What is next? Block all Kamist outposts with friendly trades while attacking all Karavan outposts? Clearly if exploitive behavior reaches that level, the devs will have to step in.
Really nothing wrong with that, and will it kill you to wait 3 days to attack a kami outpost? It's not like it was changed over on a thursday to prevent weekend wars. All in all i think everything has been above board and reasonable.
oh and jayce was it that hard not to answer a post without having to [ Edited for language against CoC - Boroshi ] ?
Yaffle - On another 'break'
Re: [DOWNTIME] Patch on Tuesday
Thread closed for offtopic, bad language, and personal insults.
In answer to the questions, the patch was applied successfully and the server instability appears to be solved.
In answer to the questions, the patch was applied successfully and the server instability appears to be solved.
Boroshi
Community Manager - English Community
Community Manager - English Community