Ryzom

a couple of the recently departed wish for me to put their email addresses on the forums so that should you guys wish to can msn them.

Fasinus - svz666@hotmail.com

Yaffle/Kye - kye_smith13@hotmail.com


Will miss you guys. There was always fun to be had with you around...

I miss you guys!!

sad to see them go,

gratz that kara who messed this up, you did good taking 2 of the funnest kamis with you. you must be proud.

ah well seems my friends list is down to 1 person online (out of 40ish)

would say "can I have your stuff" but I believe its hidden on some fools alt

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

This must be one of the sadest moments in Atys history. DONT GO!!!! I will undoubtly miss yo 2 enormously.

All the best to you guys.

While I can understand and fully support the life ban on the perpetrator, this does smack a little of punishing the victims. I assume that the reason is their breaking of rules by sharing accounts. While I can accept that they did do something wrong and SHOULD receive some form of punishment, a life time ban seems a little harsh.

Also seems, unless there have been other sanctions I haven't heard of, that the accomplices have got off scot free. There is no way you can tell me that the perpetrator of the 'account hack' (for want of a better term) worked alone. Too many coincidental events to convince me of that.

Farewell, you two, we'll meet again, in this world or another

Ani

PS: so this is what happened then?:

A and B share accounts. C shares acct with B, so B gets C, shared, maybe C gets B, doubtful. Later, C is no longer playing just to keep C active, B gets C,owned, regardless of C had B or not. So B has A and C, and A has B. then A and B (but not C) accts are shared with D, so A and B have D, C has not D, but since C is B, it's as if A, B, C have D, and D has A and B, but not C, but who cares, since B is C. A uses B, with knowledge from B, and B uses A with knowledge from B, C .. C is B, remember?, D uses A, but rarely, and B also rarely. E says E does not share, but shares, with D, but not D only, but A and B, E gets A B (and C but doesn't matter) and D, and no one gets E. A uses B and B uses A to do things A and B agree and know, but neither A nor B complain. C uses.. C is B, dang..D uses A, rarely as I said, but A does not complain neither C but A uses D, with knowledge form A and B, maybe D but definitely not E and D complains but not to A or to B, but to E and E uses A, B, C (dang C, always around), D and of course E with knowledge from (of course) and D but not C B or A, and A and B and C complain.

I can draw you this ya know....

iphdrunk wrote:
PS: so this is what happened then?:

A and B share accounts. C shares acct with B, so B gets C, shared, maybe C gets B, doubtful. Later, C is no longer playing just to keep C active, B gets C,owned, regardless of C had B or not. So B has A and C, and A has B. then A and B (but not C) accts are shared with D, so A and B have D, C has not D, but since C is B, it's as if A, B, C have D, and D has A and B, but not C, but who cares, since B is C. A uses B, with knowledge from B, and B uses A with knowledge from B, C .. C is B, remember?, D uses A, but rarely, and B also rarely. E says E does not share, but shares, with D, but not D only, but A and B, E gets A B (and C but doesn't matter) and D, and no one gets E. A uses B and B uses A to do things A and B agree and know, but neither A nor B complain. C uses.. C is B, dang..D uses A, rarely as I said, but A does not complain neither C but A uses D, with knowledge form A and B, maybe D but definitely not E and D complains but not to A or to B, but to E and E uses A, B, C (dang C, always around), D and of course E with knowledge from (of course) and D but not C B or A, and A and B and C complain.

I can draw you this ya know....

okey, who told Ani?

Should move that in to the saga forums for someone to figure out(de-code), Ani.

/waves to Fas.

iphdrunk wrote:Farewell, you two, we'll meet again, in this world or another

Ani

PS: so this is what happened then?:

A and B share accounts. C shares acct with B, so B gets C, shared, maybe C gets B, doubtful. Later, C is no longer playing just to keep C active, B gets C,owned, regardless of C had B or not. So B has A and C, and A has B. then A and B (but not C) accts are shared with D, so A and B have D, C has not D, but since C is B, it's as if A, B, C have D, and D has A and B, but not C, but who cares, since B is C. A uses B, with knowledge from B, and B uses A with knowledge from B, C .. C is B, remember?, D uses A, but rarely, and B also rarely. E says E does not share, but shares, with D, but not D only, but A and B, E gets A B (and C but doesn't matter) and D, and no one gets E. A uses B and B uses A to do things A and B agree and know, but neither A nor B complain. C uses.. C is B, dang..D uses A, rarely as I said, but A does not complain neither C but A uses D, with knowledge form A and B, maybe D but definitely not E and D complains but not to A or to B, but to E and E uses A, B, C (dang C, always around), D and of course E with knowledge from (of course) and D but not C B or A, and A and B and C complain.

I can draw you this ya know....

Now i know

You are crazy ani

A...B...or C i think it was only the Mister X PPP

Well i will miss u both,now since ur banned my life is more sad as before,with u both i had ever something to laugh,But what is now????

*huggles u 2*


Lexius
Merchants of Void
(seraching for his Lost Friends Sumsum and Uma)