a couple of the recently departed wish for me to put their email addresses on the forums so that should you guys wish to can msn them.
Fasinus - svz666@hotmail.com
Yaffle/Kye - kye_smith13@hotmail.com
Will miss you guys. There was always fun to be had with you around...
Wanting to keep in touch...
Wanting to keep in touch...
Alibooma
Was Sleeping... Is now Awake!
Was Sleeping... Is now Awake!
Re: Wanting to keep in touch...
sad to see them go,
gratz that kara who messed this up, you did good taking 2 of the funnest kamis with you. you must be proud.
ah well seems my friends list is down to 1 person online (out of 40ish)
would say "can I have your stuff" but I believe its hidden on some fools alt
gratz that kara who messed this up, you did good taking 2 of the funnest kamis with you. you must be proud.
ah well seems my friends list is down to 1 person online (out of 40ish)
would say "can I have your stuff" but I believe its hidden on some fools alt

Re: Wanting to keep in touch...
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 
This must be one of the sadest moments in Atys history. DONT GO!!!! I will undoubtly miss yo 2 enormously.

This must be one of the sadest moments in Atys history. DONT GO!!!! I will undoubtly miss yo 2 enormously.
-
Moustasch - Kami[kaze] |:-
Team Spirit - Fyros
\__/
\/

Team Spirit - Fyros
\__/
\/
Re: Wanting to keep in touch...
All the best to you guys. 
While I can understand and fully support the life ban on the perpetrator, this does smack a little of punishing the victims. I assume that the reason is their breaking of rules by sharing accounts. While I can accept that they did do something wrong and SHOULD receive some form of punishment, a life time ban seems a little harsh.
Also seems, unless there have been other sanctions I haven't heard of, that the accomplices have got off scot free. There is no way you can tell me that the perpetrator of the 'account hack' (for want of a better term) worked alone. Too many coincidental events to convince me of that.

While I can understand and fully support the life ban on the perpetrator, this does smack a little of punishing the victims. I assume that the reason is their breaking of rules by sharing accounts. While I can accept that they did do something wrong and SHOULD receive some form of punishment, a life time ban seems a little harsh.
Also seems, unless there have been other sanctions I haven't heard of, that the accomplices have got off scot free. There is no way you can tell me that the perpetrator of the 'account hack' (for want of a better term) worked alone. Too many coincidental events to convince me of that.

Elder Of Atys (ask nicely and I'll do the breakdance for you!)
All posts are In Person (Not IC, not OOC, not Rp, just me!)
Chasing the DING!
All posts are In Person (Not IC, not OOC, not Rp, just me!)
Chasing the DING!
katriell wrote:You can't "complete" the mainland. If one thinks one has seen or done everything there, one is kidding oneself. But be prepared to "get out what you put in," because the mainland does not coddle or hold hands.
Re: Wanting to keep in touch...
Farewell, you two, we'll meet again, in this world or another
Ani
PS: so this is what happened then?:
A and B share accounts. C shares acct with B, so B gets C, shared, maybe C gets B, doubtful. Later, C is no longer playing just to keep C active, B gets C,owned, regardless of C had B or not. So B has A and C, and A has B. then A and B (but not C) accts are shared with D, so A and B have D, C has not D, but since C is B, it's as if A, B, C have D, and D has A and B, but not C, but who cares, since B is C. A uses B, with knowledge from B, and B uses A with knowledge from B, C .. C is B, remember?, D uses A, but rarely, and B also rarely. E says E does not share, but shares, with D, but not D only, but A and B, E gets A B (and C but doesn't matter) and D, and no one gets E. A uses B and B uses A to do things A and B agree and know, but neither A nor B complain. C uses.. C is B, dang..D uses A, rarely as I said, but A does not complain neither C but A uses D, with knowledge form A and B, maybe D but definitely not E and D complains but not to A or to B, but to E and E uses A, B, C (dang C, always around), D and of course E with knowledge from (of course) and D but not C B or A, and A and B and C complain.
I can draw you this ya know....
Ani
PS: so this is what happened then?:
A and B share accounts. C shares acct with B, so B gets C, shared, maybe C gets B, doubtful. Later, C is no longer playing just to keep C active, B gets C,owned, regardless of C had B or not. So B has A and C, and A has B. then A and B (but not C) accts are shared with D, so A and B have D, C has not D, but since C is B, it's as if A, B, C have D, and D has A and B, but not C, but who cares, since B is C. A uses B, with knowledge from B, and B uses A with knowledge from B, C .. C is B, remember?, D uses A, but rarely, and B also rarely. E says E does not share, but shares, with D, but not D only, but A and B, E gets A B (and C but doesn't matter) and D, and no one gets E. A uses B and B uses A to do things A and B agree and know, but neither A nor B complain. C uses.. C is B, dang..D uses A, rarely as I said, but A does not complain neither C but A uses D, with knowledge form A and B, maybe D but definitely not E and D complains but not to A or to B, but to E and E uses A, B, C (dang C, always around), D and of course E with knowledge from (of course) and D but not C B or A, and A and B and C complain.
I can draw you this ya know....
Anissa - Jena's Lost Tribe -
Re: Wanting to keep in touch...
okey, who told Ani?iphdrunk wrote:
PS: so this is what happened then?:
A and B share accounts. C shares acct with B, so B gets C, shared, maybe C gets B, doubtful. Later, C is no longer playing just to keep C active, B gets C,owned, regardless of C had B or not. So B has A and C, and A has B. then A and B (but not C) accts are shared with D, so A and B have D, C has not D, but since C is B, it's as if A, B, C have D, and D has A and B, but not C, but who cares, since B is C. A uses B, with knowledge from B, and B uses A with knowledge from B, C .. C is B, remember?, D uses A, but rarely, and B also rarely. E says E does not share, but shares, with D, but not D only, but A and B, E gets A B (and C but doesn't matter) and D, and no one gets E. A uses B and B uses A to do things A and B agree and know, but neither A nor B complain. C uses.. C is B, dang..D uses A, rarely as I said, but A does not complain neither C but A uses D, with knowledge form A and B, maybe D but definitely not E and D complains but not to A or to B, but to E and E uses A, B, C (dang C, always around), D and of course E with knowledge from (of course) and D but not C B or A, and A and B and C complain.
I can draw you this ya know....

«-®-» Põ§мÖ «-®-»
Light Armor;
250 Boots, 250 Gloves, 250 Sleeves, 250 Vest, 250 Pants.
Jewels;
250 Anklet, 250 Braclet, 250 Earring, 250 Ring, 250 Diadem, 250 Pendant.
Weapons;
250 2H Pike, 250 2H Axe, 250 2H Mace, 250 2H Sword, 250 Amps, 250 Daggers.
Melee;
250 Pike, 250 Axe
Magic;
250 Elemental, 250 Heal, 250 OA, 250 DA.
Forages;
250 Forest, 250 Jungle, 250 Lake, 250 Desert, 250 PR
(Other Skillz: I'm gettin there)
If you asked me if i had a God complex, let me tell you... I am God.
Re: Wanting to keep in touch...
Should move that in to the saga forums for someone to figure out(de-code), Ani. 
/waves to Fas.

/waves to Fas.
Jayce - Right-click is your friend in this world.
Master Forest Forager | Master Prime Roots Forager |Expert Lakeland Forager @ Q250
Master Jeweler|Master Heavy Range Weaponsmith
Master Jeweler|Master Heavy Range Weaponsmith
[ Leader | Reapers of the Dark ]
[ Matis Noble | Karavaneer | Wayfarer | Arispotle ]
[ Gear Requirements | Server Status | Acronyms | Atys Time | Fireworks ]
[ Matis Noble | Karavaneer | Wayfarer | Arispotle ]
[ Gear Requirements | Server Status | Acronyms | Atys Time | Fireworks ]
Re: Wanting to keep in touch...
iphdrunk wrote:Farewell, you two, we'll meet again, in this world or another
Ani
PS: so this is what happened then?:
A and B share accounts. C shares acct with B, so B gets C, shared, maybe C gets B, doubtful. Later, C is no longer playing just to keep C active, B gets C,owned, regardless of C had B or not. So B has A and C, and A has B. then A and B (but not C) accts are shared with D, so A and B have D, C has not D, but since C is B, it's as if A, B, C have D, and D has A and B, but not C, but who cares, since B is C. A uses B, with knowledge from B, and B uses A with knowledge from B, C .. C is B, remember?, D uses A, but rarely, and B also rarely. E says E does not share, but shares, with D, but not D only, but A and B, E gets A B (and C but doesn't matter) and D, and no one gets E. A uses B and B uses A to do things A and B agree and know, but neither A nor B complain. C uses.. C is B, dang..D uses A, rarely as I said, but A does not complain neither C but A uses D, with knowledge form A and B, maybe D but definitely not E and D complains but not to A or to B, but to E and E uses A, B, C (dang C, always around), D and of course E with knowledge from (of course) and D but not C B or A, and A and B and C complain.
I can draw you this ya know....
Now i know

You are crazy ani

XYCLONE
THE REANIMATED SOUL OF GROOM
PROUD HIGHOFFICER OF
NEXUS
WAITING FOR THE LEVELCAP TO BECOME 300 OR MORE
WANTS THE LOVELY KIROSTAPATROLS BACK INGAME
Re: Wanting to keep in touch...
A...B...or C i think it was only the Mister X
PPP
Well i will miss u both,now since ur banned my life is more sad as before,with u both i had ever something to laugh,But what is now????
*huggles u 2*
Lexius
Merchants of Void
(seraching for his Lost Friends Sumsum and Uma)

Well i will miss u both,now since ur banned my life is more sad as before,with u both i had ever something to laugh,But what is now????
*huggles u 2*
Lexius
Merchants of Void
(seraching for his Lost Friends Sumsum and Uma)