Page 14 of 14

Re: A Possible Third Group (Faction ?)

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:15 pm
by turjake
tigrus wrote:You mean like EQ2 Where the pvp servers are the most populated? Or WoW where the pvp servers are most populated?
Or EVE perhaps?

Got your facts right kiddo - just checked the WoW serverlist and the PvP servers definitely aren't most populated. Maybe I don't live in your alternate gankverse though.
tigrus wrote:Now, If they are already runnin out of money, WITH the pvp crowd paying too.
Where would they be WITHOUT the pvp crowd?
Dont come here and play clever, im not harassing anyone here.
Im just sick of JYUDAS bashing pvpers in every single post he makes.
oh and btw, there are SEVERAL pvp servers in beta isnt there?

They would have 1/8 or 1/10 people less after launch, but then they didn't need to pay for extra servers or keeping up an extra ruleset either. We're talking about economy here though so they want to include every player group.

*edit* The population drop is the maximum as some people who play in PvP servers are perfectly happy about PvE as well...

And I'm sick of reading the same whines from the PvP kids from the forums of every MMO I've been on since UO - At least J is one voice of reason and moderation in the forums several others deem not worth reading or writing anymore.

And no, one not that populated PvP server in Vanguard beta, so there.

Re: A Possible Third Group (Faction ?)

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:16 pm
by grimjim
tigrus wrote:PvP draws people to online games, because its in HUMAN NATURE that they want to be BETTER then others.
I guess I'm just imagining 30+ years of successful RPG then eh?
tigrus wrote:and i know **** that wont try it BECAUSE the pvp here isnt that active, and more that left because of it.
And many more, who kept the game going and who contributed greatly to it who have left because of it.
tigrus wrote:But stop bashing on pvpers in every post you make, stop demanding things for neutrals, and start having some fun or find another game.
Stop opening your mouth, thereby requiring a rebuttal, and we have an agreement.
tigrus wrote:Im willing to bet that you are a socialist or a communist in real life Jyudas. So stop living in your little fantasy world.
Umm... the point of these games is that they're fantasy worlds. Right? If I want to get into a fight with some no-life moron desperate to prove themselves with some false machismo I can walk past the bus stop where the chav kids are hanging out drinking white-lightning and smoking cigarettes they swiped from their mum. That won't cost me anything.

As to my political affiliations or ideas, they're irrelevent, but rampant selfishness and 'I'm alright Jack' definately isn't a priority.

Re: A Possible Third Group (Faction ?)

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:21 pm
by tigrus
turjake wrote:Got your facts right kiddo - just checked the WoW serverlist and the PvP servers definitely aren't most populated. Maybe I don't live in your alternate gankverse though.



T.
Do me a favor and check EVE and EQ2 and SWG also will you?

Re: A Possible Third Group (Faction ?)

Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:24 pm
by tigrus
grimjim wrote:I guess I'm just imagining 30+ years of successful RPG then eh?
You and a few others are the exeptions that confirms the rule


grimjim wrote: Stop opening your mouth, thereby requiring a rebuttal, and we have an agreement.
Hmm, Nah :)

grimjim wrote: As to my political affiliations or ideas, they're irrelevent, but rampant selfishness and 'I'm alright Jack' definately isn't a priority.
haha