mmmmm..chocolatekiexa wrote: Keiko you are a right toblerone
EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
Re: EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
Meloner
[size=-2]
Knight Leviers
[/size]-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 11:26 pm
Re: EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
Its been quieter the last month ive been away from what ive seen, dosnt take away from the fact it was flame central not long before that. Either way would be nice to know the CSR position on it, are we allowed to do whatever the hell we like or you gunna do your jobs?ajsuk wrote:Dunno what your on, I thought it'd been pretty quiet and boring compared to the good old days.
Re: EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
sprite wrote:From one of the posts Marjo/Tydamus made (I forget who it was), it was before he started using that word that he got banned - he got banned for basically constant flaming in like 3 threads or something like that. If I could be bothered, I would try and find their post, but the thread its in probably got deleted.
Spriteh, I think you rock, but keep your lying ass out of this thread.
I wasnt banned for flaming, there wasnt a damn flame in any of my posts.
The thing I got banned for was THIS screenshot..
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=500682
In THIS thread.
http://forums.ryzom.com/forum/showthrea ... 035&page=4
Now, for anyone who doesnt know, that isnt a reason to ban anyone.
Why it happened, the CSR who did it have a issue with me.
Simple.
Re: EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
Flattery gets you only so far, so while I'm ignoring the insult, I'll just correct yousunce wrote:Spriteh, I think you rock, but keep your lying ass out of this thread.
http://forums.ryzom.com/forum/showpost. ... stcount=23
Is why you were banned from forums. In my original post change "flaming" to "arguing" or "complaining" or "bringing it up time and time again", and I'm right.Tydamus wrote:And since you kept bringing it up time and time again, that is why your forum privileges have been suspended.
And while I'm here...
Coincidence? Reminds me of when dear old Jyudas took an enforced break from the forumskyesmith13 wrote:Its been quieter the last month ive been away from what ive seen
Though Kye I must admit it had occurred to me that he (Sunce) probably would have been instabanned in the old days for "ban evasion" by making a 2nd acct...
Re: EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
The screenshot doesn't show a private conversation, just a very un private yelling contest in region (if the colors are correct) and a system info window, which isn't a conversation at all.tydamus wrote:You are allowed to prove your innocence to other players of your PvP act, as long as it does not include screen shots of private conversations. That is why your initial link was removed. And since you kept bringing it up time and time again, that is why your forum privileges have been suspended.
And, going by what Tydamus said (which shouldn't have been responded to at all on the public forums, unless something changed with Gameforge CSRs), Sunce's main account was banned because of repeatidly bringing up this screenshot which wasn't a private conversation at all.
Right?
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sat Apr 21, 2007 11:26 pm
Re: EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
If your saying i was responsible for flaming your mistaken, i disagree with people and have half a brain so enjoying expressing my side of an argument.sprite wrote: Coincidence? Reminds me of when dear old Jyudas took an enforced break from the forums
Though Kye I must admit it had occurred to me that he (Sunce) probably would have been instabanned in the old days for "ban evasion" by making a 2nd acct...
Yes back in the days of jolt you would of have an instant ban on the free account if the main was banned, but to my knowledge only a few people were banned for no good reason in all their time in charge, and that was quickly sorted.
Amuses me that your defending the new csr ^^
Re: EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
Okay Spriteh, il spell it very easily for you.
I posted a thread with 4 screenshots in, 3 of them showing the private conversation Tydamus is refering too, and 1 with the sys info which doesnt show the conversation at all, only proof of my innocence in the pvp act.
That thread got deleted, I asked for a explanation in a different thread, got it, and accepted it..
THEN, someone posts about me being involved in the pvp act, AS ALWAYS.
And I post the sys.info to prove my innocence. And thats it, not the private convo, nothing.
Then I get banned for posting that screenshot.
Which is what he refers to as repeadedly...
Now spriteh, if you can please stop talking about this stuff which you obviously doesnt have a clue as to what your talking about. Because i wasnt flaming as you said, in ANY of my threads.
And I got banned for something which he goes on to state in a different thread that I CAN do. Then he has already banned me for doing it.
Double morale anyone?
PS: yeah keiko, what you said is correct, he bans me for bringing up something that he says I am allowed to do, twice....
I posted a thread with 4 screenshots in, 3 of them showing the private conversation Tydamus is refering too, and 1 with the sys info which doesnt show the conversation at all, only proof of my innocence in the pvp act.
That thread got deleted, I asked for a explanation in a different thread, got it, and accepted it..
THEN, someone posts about me being involved in the pvp act, AS ALWAYS.
And I post the sys.info to prove my innocence. And thats it, not the private convo, nothing.
Then I get banned for posting that screenshot.
Which is what he refers to as repeadedly...
Now spriteh, if you can please stop talking about this stuff which you obviously doesnt have a clue as to what your talking about. Because i wasnt flaming as you said, in ANY of my threads.
And I got banned for something which he goes on to state in a different thread that I CAN do. Then he has already banned me for doing it.
Double morale anyone?
PS: yeah keiko, what you said is correct, he bans me for bringing up something that he says I am allowed to do, twice....
Re: EFD:: The Mercenaries on Arispotle.
Locking Thread.
This is a reminder that this is a guild forum. The discussion has evolved into a different topic from what it was started to convey. Let me take the time to remind those of you who wish to not follow forum policy, the CoC and Eula.
Forum Policy:
Code of conduct and ingame Courtesy Policy apply to the Message Board Courtesy Policy.
* You should be clear, civilized and polite.
* You may not make multiple postings about the same subject in order to gain attention.
* You may not post topics which are out of the context of the thread or forum.
* You may not do any kind of advertising for any product or service other than The Saga of Ryzom.
* You may not attack or insult other players.
The Code of Conduct, containing further rules & policies which also apply to this message board, can be found here.
We have thus far been very lenient toward the situation, however it seems that once given an inch some like to take that mile. Also, any violations of the CoC and Eula will result in any punishments necessary as according to the CoC and Eula.
This is a reminder that this is a guild forum. The discussion has evolved into a different topic from what it was started to convey. Let me take the time to remind those of you who wish to not follow forum policy, the CoC and Eula.
Forum Policy:
Code of conduct and ingame Courtesy Policy apply to the Message Board Courtesy Policy.
* You should be clear, civilized and polite.
* You may not make multiple postings about the same subject in order to gain attention.
* You may not post topics which are out of the context of the thread or forum.
* You may not do any kind of advertising for any product or service other than The Saga of Ryzom.
* You may not attack or insult other players.
The Code of Conduct, containing further rules & policies which also apply to this message board, can be found here.
We have thus far been very lenient toward the situation, however it seems that once given an inch some like to take that mile. Also, any violations of the CoC and Eula will result in any punishments necessary as according to the CoC and Eula.