Wishes

Come in, pull up a chair, let's discuss all things Ryzom-related.
User avatar
vguerin
Posts: 2025
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 6:13 pm

Re: Wishes

Post by vguerin »

grimjim wrote:Putting the tag on is optional.

A neutral tag could help or hinder, kill or be killed by and from both declared sides.
Been awhile since I agreed with you Jyudas... but I would love to see you with a tag that either side could attack... might make your guild nights more fun... Please allow this extreme change to gameplay !!!
WWJD - What Would Jena Do ?
DoubleTap - Disciple of Jena - Karavan Champion
Matis Medium Gladiator Champion
Melinoe - Atys Harvesters
WWJD - What Would Jena Do ?
User avatar
grimjim
Posts: 2784
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:00 am

Re: Wishes

Post by grimjim »

vguerin wrote:Been awhile since I agreed with you Jyudas... but I would love to see you with a tag that either side could attack... might make your guild nights more fun... Please allow this extreme change to gameplay !!!
I just advocate as many and as open options as possible. As ever. I wouldn't use this option but I think it should be available for those who want it.
--
Jyudas
High Officer in the Samsara
WEALTH & GLORY!
Currently pondering R2, please hold...
We're neutral, you're just too cheap to hire us.
Remember, other people exist than yourself.
User avatar
grimjim
Posts: 2784
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 9:00 am

Re: Wishes

Post by grimjim »

raven41 wrote:Just something that botheres me... Why should neutrals get tags? I think it would lead to more bad then good... And second and this is what bothers me... Why do (some)'neutrals' think that neutral should be its own faction... That doesn't really make sence to me, If they are a faction then they are not neutral :p imo...

And wow im tired, Probably wont remember even posting this... So if it doesn't make sence, well ignore it :)
Why shouldn't they? Why should they not get the option?
And neutral covers a great deal of different types. It's about providing the options to play out those roles, not about unifying it under any particular creed.
--
Jyudas
High Officer in the Samsara
WEALTH & GLORY!
Currently pondering R2, please hold...
We're neutral, you're just too cheap to hire us.
Remember, other people exist than yourself.
kipestia
Posts: 55
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:09 pm

Re: Wishes

Post by kipestia »

I think neutral should get some advantages to balance out the difficulty they will have in often being between the Kami and Karavan groups.

I would imagine a united group would be able to more easily get into the Prime Roots than a faction that's warring with another faction. While I don't want all neutrals to be forced into the role of peace-makers uniting both factions, I do think it's a very good idea. and just like the game system pitting the predator animals against the herbivores, allow the game to see how it balances out. See if progress is made with united homins. See if war among the Kami and Karavan weakens them against the Kitin or better prepares them for battle...

Then again, maybe the advantage given to neutrals would be to be treated as non-hostiles in regions controlled by either faction of the 4 races above-ground when not in PVP mode, and treated by hostile by everyone when it is on. :> (I'm speaking in context of the spire NPC guards and respawning)

I find it very odd that in the description of the spires implementation, a land controlled by one faction will still allow enemies to respawn NEAR THEIR CAPITAL CITY. How does that make the most sense?
Post Reply

Return to “General”