(Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Come in, pull up a chair, let's discuss all things Ryzom-related.
User avatar
dakhound
Posts: 1768
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:40 pm

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by dakhound »

ok question answered............let the BS begin

..........oh damn it beat me here ;)
bgraz
Posts: 215
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 6:00 pm

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by bgraz »

vguerin wrote: Yet the conduct in question is going on @ Woodburn between Team Spirit and The Souls... We'd just like to know if it's okay for players to block OP's in this fashion...
unless you have inside information on this transaction, mabey the Soul are just letting TS be owners for a while so they can enjoy the status of owning a top level OP. you know Vguerin there are others in this game besides yourself and your alliance that would enjoy holding such a piece of realestate, but then again seems you have no regard for other so they are only trying to exploit 1 of 2 q250 OPs not held by your alliance
User avatar
ajsuk
Posts: 2320
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:21 pm

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by ajsuk »

Several questions around the same subject to be asked and answered. Whats your issue? Not liking the flak about the same sorta things you lot used to get up to back in the day?
Jayce - Right-click is your friend in this world.
Master Forest Forager | Master Prime Roots Forager |Expert Lakeland Forager @ Q250
Master
Jeweler
|Master Heavy Range Weaponsmith
[ Leader | Reapers of the Dark ]
[ Matis Noble | Karavaneer | Wayfarer | Arispotle ]
[ Gear Requirements | Server Status | Acronyms | Atys Time | Fireworks ]
User avatar
ajsuk
Posts: 2320
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:21 pm

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by ajsuk »

bgraz wrote:unless you have inside information on this transaction, mabey the Soul are just letting TS be owners for a while so they can enjoy the status of owning a top level OP. you know Vguerin there are others in this game besides yourself and your alliance that would enjoy holding such a piece of realestate, but then again seems you have no regard for other so they are only trying to exploit 1 of 2 q250 OPs not held by your alliance
everything in that post is wrong. :)
Jayce - Right-click is your friend in this world.
Master Forest Forager | Master Prime Roots Forager |Expert Lakeland Forager @ Q250
Master
Jeweler
|Master Heavy Range Weaponsmith
[ Leader | Reapers of the Dark ]
[ Matis Noble | Karavaneer | Wayfarer | Arispotle ]
[ Gear Requirements | Server Status | Acronyms | Atys Time | Fireworks ]
rundll32
Posts: 892
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 3:33 pm

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by rundll32 »

ajsuk wrote:everything in that post is wrong. :)
lol! New forum sig...
Rundll
High Officer of Order of the Nameless
User avatar
ajsuk
Posts: 2320
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 4:21 pm

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by ajsuk »

rundll32 wrote:lol! New forum sig...
w00t!

FAME & GLORY! FOR THE REAPERS! :p
Jayce - Right-click is your friend in this world.
Master Forest Forager | Master Prime Roots Forager |Expert Lakeland Forager @ Q250
Master
Jeweler
|Master Heavy Range Weaponsmith
[ Leader | Reapers of the Dark ]
[ Matis Noble | Karavaneer | Wayfarer | Arispotle ]
[ Gear Requirements | Server Status | Acronyms | Atys Time | Fireworks ]
User avatar
0balgus0
Posts: 165
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:42 am

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by 0balgus0 »

vguerin wrote:Yet the conduct in question is going on @ Woodburn between Team Spirit and The Souls... We'd just like to know if it's okay for players to block OP's in this fashion...

Well, if names are going to be dropped, let's follow the Guild Registry of OPs thread for the actual guilds in question.

(Basically, it doesn't sound like TS is involved).
User avatar
d29565
Posts: 1146
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 4:41 pm

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by d29565 »

vguerin wrote: Yet the conduct in question is going on @ Woodburn between Team Spirit and The Souls... We'd just like to know if it's okay for players to block OP's in this fashion...
Team Spirit has not been involved in the actual exchange of the OP. In other words, we have not taken posession of Woodburn Stronghold...ever. Kindly get your information right before putting our name into something.

Edit: Team Spirit does send it's newer members as a way to learn what an OP battle is, and teach them what to do and what not to do.
Last edited by d29565 on Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
arfindel
Posts: 571
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 8:14 am

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by arfindel »

TS has never changed OP, or owned other OP since we merged with Emperor's Fist, 02 Apr 2006.

However I don't think it's exploit to change OP and raise thr (after all newbies have loads of fun fighting the NPCs).
I don't find it quite a tactics to be proud of if you do it on a regular base of course.

But I wonder why are you asking right now this on the forums... If I remember correctly you didn't win by war that Zorai OP and you never asked at that time if the community would agree on that or not :)
>>> FAA - TS <<<
primus inter pares

------------------------------------------
"Since once I sat upon a promontory,
And heard a mermaid on a dolphin's back"
User avatar
varelse
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:42 am

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Post by varelse »

Marjo wrote:Outposts aren't supposed to belong to the same guild ad vitam eternam but should change of owner through wars or diplomacy to spice up guilds' activity.

This response would seem to indicate that any repeated use of the game mechanics with the intent to keep an outpost in the same hands forever, will be 'frowned upon' by the CSR team. I think that's a clear enough indication of what we can expect to be considered as fair play by our CSR team.

As I read this, it's apparently ok to peacefully transfer an outpost from time to time, as part of a diplomatic agreement, and it's ok to level the threshold while in the process of doing this, but only so long as the 'spirit of the law' is not violated, and that outpost is not permanently locked into the possession of one guild.
Locked

Return to “General”