PvP or not ?

[dbritt]

Very nice to have a good laugh here on the forums again. GMs are our government, whether we like it or not...if you get those threats, then i'd say you were doing something wrong. Sorry, get over it, move on, and try not to get mad and post something that will backfire on you.

H

[calel]

Well the idea of making large cities (capitals at least) a PvP-free area (like the spawn points) looks really sound to me.

About harrassment. KoO has been created as an intensive PvP guild. But PvP at ops is one thing, while continuous rading of cities - quite another.

It was not banned by the devs so far, but doesn't seem right either.

I doubt the problem lies there. If you 'tag up' you consent to it, wherever you are. Even if it would be in Yrkanis' Throne room.
It seems perfectly plausible opposing Factions or Nations would conduct raids on enemy towns to put the pressure on their foes.

What doesn' t seem right however is there' s no consequences to it. Currently the Yrkanis Guards' job description only contains keeping up their pace, steady patrolling and saving the occasional new player from packs of bloodthirsty yubos and gingos. They' re 'just doing their job'.
And no matter faith or citizenship, if you bring skirmishes and bloodshed to a town you should expect the local populace and traders to turn their backs on you or at least raise their prices.


But to keep with the topic: If you act disrespectfull, then you know what' s comming. And it ain' t Jena or Ma-Duk that eats souls.

[kaetemi]

What doesn' t seem right however is there' s no consequences to it. ... if you bring skirmishes and bloodshed to a town you should expect the local populace and traders to turn their backs on you or at least raise their prices.

Getting and losing fame for PvP'ing?

Seriously, towns should be set as pvp-safe zones in the game. As long as the game allows you to kill someone somewhere, you can kill him there. If you do it for no reason, then it's up to the other players to punish (kill) you, that's not the job of the csr. It's still a game.

[ajsuk]

Yes, Min's post is accurate. I even copy/pasted the ticket I sent to the GMs in around chat before they got there to give you guys the chance to stop peeing around so you've got no excuse. Itstragic, Itsmagic.

[rundll32]

Itstragic, Itsmagic.

rofl......

[philu]

Yes, Min's post is accurate. I even copy/pasted the ticket I sent to the GMs in around chat before they got there to give you guys the chance to stop peeing around so you've got no excuse. Itstragic, Itsmagic.

So you can confirm (since you were there) that the reason the GMs got involved was because they were being abusive, not because they were doing PvP? It wasn't the PvP in Yrk that was the issue? Just the WAY they were doing it?

If that's the case then I'm with you and the GMs.

If you're gonna do PvP then at least have the decency to respect other players. By all means enjoy your PvP but don't spoil it for others by being immature or abusive or disrepectful.

If the case is now closed (as it seems to be), I respectfully suggest this thread be locked before any more pointless discussion occurs.

[kaetemi]

before any more pointless discussion occurs.

nice weather, isn't it?

muahahahaa