I was trying to point out, using myself as an example, many people can agree or disagree without saying anything. *sigh*dbritt wrote:Then make it two...hardly the majority...now I think since i'm in that kind of mood, i'm going to make a poll thread to vote for the forum president
H
Souls for forum president !dbritt wrote:i'm going to make a poll thread to vote for the forum president
omsop wrote:ohhh Heavyn, anyone ever tell you, YOUR sooo Sexy when you get mad?
/target Heavyn
/love
there is always silly kamis who are willing to buy mats from karavaneers.raven41 wrote:They will run out of dappers sooner or later ..
*chuckle*dbritt wrote: and one more thing, just because the reasoning makes sense in your head Grimjim, doesnt make it right, give it a rest, you arent the brightest bulb on the block...trust me on that one, this is not your game, it is everyones game, quit trying to speak for everyone when I havent seen more than one person besides you agree with what you say.
Note I didn't actually condemn it. I don't see much wrong with it. It's hypocritical in people who claim to like battling however.sprite wrote:Funny... I was gonna say something similar...
When you were doing it, karavan guilds got blamed for attacking you in the first place.
When we're doing something different that merely looks vaguely similar (differences explained by Oud) guess who gets blamed for what you strenuously denied was wrong? Ohmai,
1. So you say. I don't much care and don't see a particular problem if you were, other than it's a bit hypocritical after before.oldmess wrote:2 differences:
1. We're just transfering ownership, not trying to block anyone's ability to play. The actual battles to transfer ownership are occuring. You were declaring and then cancelling the battle at the last minute. (or at least that's how I remember it)
2. There was NO cost to you to do it before. So you could keep it up indefinitely.
. you can't make me and I doubt GMs would ban me for trying =p.omsop wrote:Kye grow up man, the Kami interfered with original Switch and the goal was not met
Actually I think you'll find the Kami are being blamed for this second declaration.sprite wrote:Funny... I was gonna say something similar...
When you were doing it, karavan guilds got blamed for attacking you in the first place.
When we're doing something different that merely looks vaguely similar (differences explained by Oud) guess who gets blamed for what you strenuously denied was wrong? Ohmai,
katriell wrote:You can't "complete" the mainland. If one thinks one has seen or done everything there, one is kidding oneself. But be prepared to "get out what you put in," because the mainland does not coddle or hold hands.
