sprite wrote:To quote scarazi... "dum di dum"
Besides this, the quote that everyone gives from Ciri...means "What is your stance towards guilds that are in an alliance, and what is your stance towards other guilds?" And it seems to me that most replies have been answering a percieved question about the guilds who attacked Whirling (with the notable exception of Snake's post)
That might be true if you selectively quote Ciri, but if you quote the WHOLE question to Nexus:
targosz wrote:Question to Nexus Guild -What is your stance toward all karavan guilds - either united under alliance named KA and those outside? I wonder this cause would like to ask politely if we any of this guilds should be worring about being attacked by you and your kamist and neutrals allies ?
It clearly refers to the guilds who attacked Whirling. So that's the question that was answered.
Besides you missed an important word out of your attempt to explain what Ciri meant - KARAVAN. You should have said - "What is your stance towards KARAVAN guilds that are in an alliance, and what is your stance towards other KARAVAN guilds?"
oldmess wrote:That may be. There are different definitions of the word "retake". The basic one is if when a guild originally held and OP and then lost it. i.e. if the Soul attacks Malmont, no one will debate that they are trying to "retake" it. They held it first.
But if the Soul attacks Zo Kian, the use of the word "retake" is highly debatable since they didn't hold it first. That doesn't mean shouldn't try if they want, but let's use the words to mean what they really mean. It might help to avoid some of the misinformation that pervades these forums.
In the case of Whirling, I suspect OV probably regards themselves as "liberating it" from a Kami guild for the good of the Lakelands. Nexus regards themselves as "liberating it" from Matis oppression. Neither one regards themselves as the bad guy.
But that wasn't my main point. My main point was simply to refute philu's statement that all of the attacks on original holdings have been by the KA. That's simply not true. It's a great example of how the propoganda against us has been quite successful and has created many false impressions.
I agree with most of this but will clarify MY definition of re-take. I meant re-take as in EITHER take back an OP you owned OR take back an OP in your OWN land that is owned by another race. Is that clear enough for you?
Fine refute my statement but at least please back it up with examples rather than "I'm not going to list them". Seriously, I'd like to know who the aggressive Fyros/Zorai/Tryker guilds are because I am not aware of it. I want to be in possession of the full facts so I can make informed opinions. If you don't want to post it here, please feel free to PM me the info.

Elder Of Atys (ask nicely and I'll do the breakdance for you!)
All posts are In Person (Not IC, not OOC, not Rp, just me!)
Chasing the DING!
katriell wrote:You can't "complete" the mainland. If one thinks one has seen or done everything there, one is kidding oneself. But be prepared to "get out what you put in," because the mainland does not coddle or hold hands.