Multiple Attack

Come in, pull up a chair, let's discuss all things Ryzom-related.
Post Reply
raven41
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:23 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by raven41 »

hmm interesting ..Who exactly are you CLAIMING attacked first ? the random fools that delclaired under a false name ..that for all we know could verywell be Kara in discise ...My guild surely did not "attack" for we only look for help defending an attack...

In the end it was a unknown who truely broke the peace and if they are to cowardess to show there real names why show there real allience ?

We really do not know and to say kami broke the peace is absolute fulishness...sorry to say..tho I am sorry... I must state that..
~Red-slayer~

[COLOR=red]Lord of the universe[/COLOR]

[COLOR=red]Truth - Honor - Integrity[/COLOR]

~Atys Paladin at heart~ALWAYS!

User avatar
kyesmith
Posts: 1480
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 9:29 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by kyesmith »

omsop wrote:Remove OutPosts from the game. PROBLEM SOLVED :P
finally agree with you- they were nice but not worth the effort and stress :)
Yaffle - On another 'break'


User avatar
evalisa
Posts: 351
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 12:16 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by evalisa »

Outposts are fine as long as you want to pvp, i still dont quite understand why people hold them if they dont like it (many guilds give out crystals to there friends)
raven41
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:23 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by raven41 »

evalisa wrote:Outposts are fine as long as you want to pvp, i still dont quite understand why people hold them if they dont like it (many guilds give out crystals to there friends)
I don't know who you're refering to but i'll respond as if you're refering to the paladins.We don't mind fighting for what is ours .. But we have a bit more bit a diplomatic stance I guess you could say and there was no dimplomicy at all in this matter just a attack...maybe they should have made demands (preposterous ones) that we wouldn't want to meet then launch the attack.

Not all people like to play "if you have it I can take it" Is it wronge for us to hope a cumunity with far more mature peeps then anyother game I know of
to have some diplomicy ? maybe we like to RP and you guys are just killing our fun ? I mean this is a mmo "R !! P !!! G !!!!"...not a RTS ...Or a FPS that you just attack at random

P.S. I hope the false declarations don't kill the fun of this coming battle.

[edit] sorry for the impateince I show atm but lets just move on
~Red-slayer~

[COLOR=red]Lord of the universe[/COLOR]

[COLOR=red]Truth - Honor - Integrity[/COLOR]

~Atys Paladin at heart~ALWAYS!

blaah
Posts: 1333
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:43 am

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by blaah »

raven41 wrote:...maybe they should have made demands (preposterous ones) that we wouldn't want to meet then launch the attack.
;-) history shows at least one such reason to attack outpost that backfired.
User avatar
kostika
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:48 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by kostika »

vguerin wrote: Is a friend of my enemy also not an enemy ?
Is the friend of my friend also a friend to me?


I think we need to talk more DT.
~Kostika
Guild Leader of The Samsara
Atys Guardian

Stand and Deliver!!
User avatar
evalisa
Posts: 351
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 12:16 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by evalisa »

I am also an RP'er ingame. However a undeclaired strike is a tactic used by many aggressors

and sorry i did not mean to bring up the AP, just the whole attitude in general, but i understand your point and thus will try to avoid arguing it (to much ;) )

As for the random, un-named false declarations, i am in agreement that its cowerdly, but i would have to also frown upon such a retaliaton as to do the same
raven41
Posts: 1485
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2005 10:23 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by raven41 »

evalisa wrote:and sorry i did not mean to bring up the AP, just the whole attitude in general, but i understand your point and thus will try to avoid arguing it (to much ;) )
lol ...fair enough :p ..and ok it just seemed somewhat aimed at our situation..so sorry if I took that diferently then you had meant :)

Seems we pretty much agree on the last part about false declarations to ;)
~Red-slayer~

[COLOR=red]Lord of the universe[/COLOR]

[COLOR=red]Truth - Honor - Integrity[/COLOR]

~Atys Paladin at heart~ALWAYS!

danolt
Posts: 355
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 10:35 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by danolt »

raven41 wrote:hmm interesting ..Who exactly are you CLAIMING attacked first ? the random fools that delclaired under a false name ..that for all we know could verywell be Kara in discise ...My guild surely did not "attack" for we only look for help defending an attack...

In the end it was a unknown who truely broke the peace and if they are to cowardess to show there real names why show there real allience ?

We really do not know and to say kami broke the peace is absolute fulishness...sorry to say..tho I am sorry... I must state that..
Since we now know that the AP fully endorses and participates in infiltrating the privacy of other organizations and that they feel it is their moral duty to share selected quotes from any forum or conversation they see fit. I suggest Chrono use his spy network to locate these Karavan Haters and then write a really mean post about them. That will show'em.

Pero
User avatar
evalisa
Posts: 351
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2004 12:16 pm

Re: Multiple Attack

Post by evalisa »

*trys not to laugth at peros post but fails*

Now now lets try not to tun this into any more of a flame fest than it already is
Post Reply

Return to “General”