Thank you raven, glad we can to terms a little...
I will point out one thing about your last post...just to clarify....you say they are hypocrits for redeclaring on multiple targets, and although I dont totally agree with it (although I do understand why) I can only point out one fact. The retribution was done in the name of a REAL guild, not one hiding behind alts. That was the main problem with the multiple declarations in teh first place, the fact that whoever it was couldnt stand up to their ideals and let their name out....think in the past it was called cowardice.
H
Multiple Attack
Re: Multiple Attack
Heavyn
~~The Barefoot Digger~~
[highlight]
Leader of Pegasus Foundation
[/highlight]
"Did I say that in region?"
Re: Multiple Attack
darn good pointAnd humm (Karavan haters) allowed by CoC ?
Heavyn
~~The Barefoot Digger~~
[highlight]
Leader of Pegasus Foundation
[/highlight]
"Did I say that in region?"
Re: Multiple Attack
Whoever did the fake attacks a little tip for next time, only declear 12 hours 10mins before the OP battle you want to distract- that way theres not enough time for those you attacked to declear on your OPs
Yaffle - On another 'break'
Re: Multiple Attack
Hmm a good point ..But must you punish everyone else for one(maybe more but doubt it)persons childishness ? and if the peep was from my guild ..Then I hope I find out who it is because I don't want a coward like that in the same guild as me..dbritt wrote:I can only point out one fact. The retribution was done in the name of a REAL guild, not one hiding behind alts. That was the main problem with the multiple declarations in teh first place, the fact that whoever it was couldnt stand up to their ideals and let their name out....think in the past it was called cowardice
In the end this will only ruin the fun that could have been at the OP fight between our guilds..Because all will be at there OPs to be safe ..This could make an advantage for my guild..but .. its not an honorable advantage and i don't like it
~Red-slayer~
[COLOR=red]Lord of the universe[/COLOR]
[COLOR=red]Truth - Honor - Integrity[/COLOR]
~Atys Paladin at heart~ALWAYS!
Re: Multiple Attack
Quoted because it shouldn't be buried. Padawan, please accept my apologies for derailing the thread.cold1 wrote: my problem is :
1.Create a guild (false), kill all politic option in game.
2.Guild whit probably 1 member attack 3 high OP, no sense for me.
3.Attack 3 OP at the same time/date some ppl call this tactic, ok fine so next time i want attack someone i can declare war on 6 OP and annoyed 5 guilds for nothing ... buttt heyyy this is a tactic sorry about scrap 2 hour of your life.
4.To ppl who think this is a tactic, you need to know this multiple attack just bring more ppl in game at this time and when you attack one of them after you cry you are outnumber.
Finaly i do that for make some reaction in game and of course here.This thread is nothing about PF or AP or Kami/Kara but more about mechanic OP and show how is easy Stunt this server whit Multiple Attack.So please lets talk about the Topic.
And humm (Karavan haters) allowed by CoC ?
-Padawan
Dazman - Zoraï Defensive Mage / Forager
Kalzakath - Fyros Melee / New Refugee
Arispotle Shard - European English Community
Kalzakath - Fyros Melee / New Refugee
Arispotle Shard - European English Community
Re: Multiple Attack
Just to clarify this publicly as I already have privately.vguerin wrote:Yet the neutral guilds once again choose sides with the Kami and intend to be aggressive to us and expect us not to defend ourselves.
We have not taken sides with anyone. We are NOT involved in any attacks on anyone. We do not get involved in attacks on anyone.
Each member is free to have their own opinion in my guild. Do not take something one member of my guild says as ruling for my whole guild. I am the only person who can speak for my whole guild. Just because one person in my guild has leanings towards the Kami or Karavan, that does not mean the whole guild follows suit.
This is merely a clarification, not an attack.
Re: Multiple Attack
Nice post Anissa, you had almost the exact same thought I did; remove the waiting period for the attack phase and make outpost battles more real time, but still allow the defenders to choose a time for their defence phase.
In this particular case where a fake guild has declared, I'd say "so what? why bother to turn up for the attack?". If there is actually any attack and that proves successful due to some friendly support, then a fake guild with noone in it stands to take possession. IF the defenders fail to hold it in their defence phase.
In this particular case where a fake guild has declared, I'd say "so what? why bother to turn up for the attack?". If there is actually any attack and that proves successful due to some friendly support, then a fake guild with noone in it stands to take possession. IF the defenders fail to hold it in their defence phase.
Re: Multiple Attack
and, yes, I did trawl through a lot of depressing stuff posted recently. If anyone is feeling a little tense, feel welcome to /tell me ingame and I would be delighted to help
Pssst! Z! Do you have any more of that hot firewine, please?
Pssst! Z! Do you have any more of that hot firewine, please?
Re: Multiple Attack
Remove OutPosts from the game. PROBLEM SOLVED
[COLOR=yellow]«-®-» Põ§мÖ «-®-»[/COLOR]
Light Armor;
250 Boots, 250 Gloves, 250 Sleeves, 250 Vest, 250 Pants.
Jewels;
250 Anklet, 250 Braclet, 250 Earring, 250 Ring, 250 Diadem, 250 Pendant.
Weapons;
250 2H Pike, 250 2H Axe, 250 2H Mace, 250 2H Sword, 250 Amps, 250 Daggers.
Melee;
250 Pike, 250 Axe
Magic;
250 Elemental, 250 Heal, 250 OA, 250 DA.
Forages;
250 Forest, 250 Jungle, 250 Lake, 250 Desert, 250 PR
(Other Skillz: I'm gettin there)
If you asked me if i had a God complex, let me tell you... I am God.
Re: Multiple Attack
Just to clarify this publicly as I already have privately.kostika wrote:Just to clarify this publicly as I already have privately.
We have not taken sides with anyone. We are NOT involved in any attacks on anyone. We do not get involved in attacks on anyone.
I fully believe in every homin having freewill, I was merely pointing out a constant anti-Karavan rant by an individual holding alliegiance to a neutral guild. Publicly stating allegiance to Kamists brings up a name in Karavaneers discussions... and they are not the name of the individual, it is the guild.
Is a friend of my enemy also not an enemy ?
You saw this post and the context it was made in I guess, good for you. I have seen much more than these alleged "clear posts" and I can only wish they went beyond the talk. If every thread written played out beyond the "I would like to..." stage I'd be standing on top of the world.too young to know better wrote:-.- .....lol.....there was a clear post in the kara allience forums on the attack it was going to happen so kara broke the peace ..
It's stands as fact that the Kamists attacked first and we'll be taking names of all those attending... Our counter attacks will surely effect each and every guild that attends the attacks on our outposts.
You may have released the Krakken...
WWJD - What Would Jena Do ?
DoubleTap - Disciple of Jena - Karavan Champion
Matis Medium Gladiator Champion
Melinoe - Atys Harvesters
Matis Medium Gladiator Champion
Melinoe - Atys Harvesters
WWJD - What Would Jena Do ?