Should Guilds be amalgamating now?

[alyssah]

That's news to me

Ehhmm!! Spriteh you're gonna kill me. In the list you compiled, there is a guild you know very well listed as neutral. I believe that means neither Kami or Kara.

Sorry.

[sprite]

there is a guild you know very well listed as neutral. I believe that means neither Kami or Kara.

And this will cause problems how?

Edit: just to be completely clear I'm referring to

So it certainly won't work later.

[alyssah]

And this will cause problems how?

Spriteh, you were always our expert on fame matters. Perhaps you would elaborate on a neutral stance taken in FvF times. ie. 'later'.

Please note, my main comment was whether or not alliances (immaterial of fame) would be able to combine for Outpost purposes? If not then the little guilds will need to strengthen or wither. I did not think that an alliance could collectively take an outpost.

[hugedan]

just kill anyone whos not in the alliance or on friendly terms and not kami based> easy

[sprite]

Spriteh, you were always our expert on fame matters. Perhaps you would elaborate on a neutral stance taken in FvF times. ie. 'later'.

I'd be happy to

Look here and note where it says:
"Guilds would then be able to declare themselves as neutral or from a major faction." So "neutral" will be a possibility
"A pro-Kami guild would not be allowed to have pro-Karavan members, but neutral members would be allowed." We can only assume this will work for alliances too
"A non-neutral player with his PvP flag off would be able to join Faction-oriented PvP only by entering a dedicated area." and "Neutral players would not be affected by Faction oriented PvP, whether their PvP flag is on or off." Showing the difference between the two

As for your "main comment", I'm afraid only someone from Nevrax could answer that

[alyssah]

Thanks Spriteh. I knew you were the expert.

[catfud]

Im confused at this point though, considering that being Kami alligned was the most emphasised point when we founded the GA, when did this change? where was this announced? Was it taken to the vote and if not why?

[keoni]

Keoni, having been ingame for about 18 months I don't really appreciate you lecturing me about choices of Guilds.

I was making a general reply to the topic of the post, giving my advice to whoever is out there in a situation similar to what I describe. When I say "your guild" I am therefore not specifically referring to MCO or AoA, and I'm certainly not "lecturing" anyone.

[philu]

I'd be happy to

Look here and note where it says:
"Guilds would then be able to declare themselves as neutral or from a major faction." So "neutral" will be a possibility
"A pro-Kami guild would not be allowed to have pro-Karavan members, but neutral members would be allowed." We can only assume this will work for alliances too
"A non-neutral player with his PvP flag off would be able to join Faction-oriented PvP only by entering a dedicated area." and "Neutral players would not be affected by Faction oriented PvP, whether their PvP flag is on or off." Showing the difference between the two

As for your "main comment", I'm afraid only someone from Nevrax could answer that

Yeah but what about a "neutral" guild where most of it's members have pro-Karavan fame? Eh? What about them? Will they still be able to claim neutrality?

And yes I AM talking about your guild.

[hugedan]

kept that one quite a sprite