I try again. PvP or PvE

[aylwyne]

I'm not so much for or against either one. What I don't like is PvE or PvP being reduced to strictly combat. I think both of these terms get equated with only combat too many times, both in people's minds as well as in the game mechanics itself.

I'd love to see more PvP and PvE action that was non-combat. For example, why not have a system where to take control of one of the "workshop" outposts, your crafters and harvesters have to work to craft a certain quota of items (PvE). Then, for another guild to take over the outpost, they have to beat your production level by 20% (PvP).

Likewise, for a diplomatic outpost, perhaps the initial requirement is to gain a certain number of fame points in a given time and for another guild to take over, they could do more missions in a given week than you did.

I'd love to see more non-combat options both for PvP and PvE.

But if you reduce it down to an only combat question, I guess PvE would be my strong choice.

[vutescu]

PvP - Player vs Player (aka pk - player killing)
PvE - Player vs Enviroment
PvM - Player vs Mob (or Monster)
PvS - Player vs Spouse (when the parther does not understand why you HAVE to level ele in tonight)

[morzyr]

PvS - Player vs Spouse (when the parther does not understand why you HAVE to level ele in tonight)

Well Problem wit PvS is what Ranged is not nerfed at all, and ther is plenty of ammo here

[zyrom]

Well Problem wit PvS is what Ranged is not nerfed at all, and ther is plenty of ammo here

Specially if said partner is going PMS

[morzyr]

*Screams in terror and runs of buying BIG locks to the door to the holy pc room*

[vutescu]

Well Problem wit PvS is what Ranged is not nerfed at all, and ther is plenty of ammo here

No need of ammo here. Just afflictions (curses especially) *chuckles* :>