Alot of very good points made on both sides, but I seem to get the feeling people dont mind RP, as long as it doesn't affect their enjoyment of the game.
We all paid for the game and stump up our few bob every month to enter the land of Atys, so we all deserve parity of esteem in our enjoyment of the game. If someone (no names no pack drill

) wants to experience their game, portraying a PK'r, thats OK by me, as long as they confine their PK'ing to somebody that wants to do it, there is a Consentual PvP ability everwhere in the land and not confined to PR.
BUT, if somebody has paid for the game and the monthly installment on top of that, If they dont want to PvP, They should be allowed unhindered enjoyment of the game and not be attacked against their wishes. They are RP'ing a peaceful person, what right does somebody RP'ing a Griefer have that makes their rights worth nothing?
The arguement that PR is a PvP area and there's a warning etc. holds no water for me, as far as I'm concerned, it's a place for guilds to sort out their grievances.
Anybody who has worked hard enough to be able to hunt/forage/harvest etc. in PR, in my opinion have already paid their dues via DP and frustration and their reward is to be able to work in those areas with out someone inflicting
their version of enjoyment on them.
If I'm in PR and I see a griefer attacking another player without their consent, I will wade in on the side of the attackee, I dont care what factions are involved.
Just my 2 d worth
Valda.