Page 1 of 2
PvP or PvE
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:47 pm
by kay22626
I noticed people feel strongly about this particular subject (me included). I was wondering if the majority of Ryzom players would rather have new PvP or PvE content added.
I dont want this post to turn into a debate, thats why i didnt even mention my position on this issue, so please just vote without posting a reply

Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 9:56 pm
by iceaxe68
kay22626 wrote:... please just vote without posting a reply
Eh? How do I do that?
My vote:
C. All of the above
or, D. Any of the above, pleeeeeeez!?!?!
or maybe some EVERYONEvSUNCE features.
(jk sun)
Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:03 pm
by vguerin
Spires are not PvP content (faction) and were never liked by the community...
No vote, putting the word "spires" in will probably turn many off.
Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2007 11:07 pm
by beaut666
...can't reply...must not....reply.....
Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:20 am
by kay22626
beaut666 wrote:...can't reply...must not....reply.....
You can reply as long as it wont start a PvP vs PvE dispute
Only made this poll out of curiosity...and worry about what the future of Ryzom might be like....last thing i want is start one more endless dispute.
If you want to point out a possible mistake i made or make a suggestion you welcome to do so and it will be appreciated

Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:38 am
by beaut666
No, I'm happy for the thread and the poll..good poll! I was just pointing out how hard it is for me not to reply to things.
If it does help, I voted "both"...in the spirit of neutrality!

Didn't mean to hijack!
Beau
Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 1:46 am
by fiach
I voted PvE, although I like PvP alot, I think this game has more PvP choice than almost any other game, you can have :
No PvP
Tagged PvP
Consentual PvP (duels)
Factional PvP
Outposts.
I really think more PvE is whats needed, 90% (figuratively speaking), is just grinding away at mobs, personally I'm fine with that, but that limitation is keeping out alot of potential players and that really needs to be addressed.
Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:21 am
by katriell
Although I enjoy PvP, I voted PvE, because although I'm generally not concerned about "potential" in a game, there is quite a bit of potential for fun and interesting PvE things here. Things that are either already possible (such as invasions and storyline events), or partly-finished and not yet implemented (like the Kitins' Lair).
Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 4:42 am
by setstyle
Voted PvE, not only is it what interested me in the Saga of Ryzom in the first place, but most of what was promised to us players falls under that category. Active events, the RAID engine, 3 years to finish rites, development of the Kitin Lair...
Re: PvP or PvE
Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 7:17 am
by gcaldani
Voted both. Actually you can't have a successful game without both.
The only thing to add is that one must not affect the other.
PvP must not reduce PvE content
PvE must not need PvP actions (ie: to double your PvE xp you must use cats, that's a PvP content).