Page 1 of 7
Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 9:32 am
by grimjim
No word on fixing the temp inventory bug?
I'd quite like to dig again without tearing my hair out (more than usual anyway).
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 10:11 am
by kyesmith
The latest dig bug is without a doubt the most annoying in a long time, digging supremes, run out of focus so sit to re-gen- oh bugger...
Would be amazing to have that sort as soon as possible although i'm sure its their top priority
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 11:57 am
by chud1
aye as a newbie trying to level harvest its a real danger aswell
getting blown to smithers for lvl 40 mats gas cloud deaths are becoming more frequent
soldier on n all that
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:00 pm
by grimjim
chud1 wrote:aye as a newbie trying to level harvest its a real danger aswell
getting blown to smithers for lvl 40 mats gas cloud deaths are becoming more frequent
soldier on n all that
i think you just need to careplan.
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:29 pm
by rushin
grimjim wrote:i think you just need to careplan.
sorry to jump in, but careplanning really isnt worth the effort (or the sp) until you hit lv50 and get the ecosystem specs.
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:28 pm
by sehracii
IMO, this dig bug is something that should have been reversed *immediately* when it was discovered.
Can't they just revert to how it was before that patch and go back to getting it right?
For the life of me, I can't figure out why they were messing with the temporary inventory in the first place. What they were trying to do was pointless, who prioritized that?
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:45 pm
by geezas
sehracii wrote: who prioritized that?
Murphy
There should be a law against it
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:48 pm
by philu
sehracii wrote:IMO, this dig bug is something that should have been reversed *immediately* when it was discovered.
Can't they just revert to how it was before that patch and go back to getting it right?
For the life of me, I can't figure out why they were messing with the temporary inventory in the first place. What they were trying to do was pointless, who prioritized that?
I agree totally, so many other things they could have worked on. I can only assume they figured it was a quick and easy thing to work on. I guess they were wrong!
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:52 pm
by grimjim
geezas wrote:Murphy
There should be a law against it
If it had worked, it would have been good - possibly.
I'm still not clear on quite how it was supposed to work.
Re: Wot no patch?
Posted: Thu Jul 27, 2006 3:57 pm
by sehracii
It's just something I've never heard anyone complain about, when there are probably 100 changes people *have* actually suggested that should be just as easy to do....