Proposal for Southend Dunes Farm
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2006 12:04 am
I want Southend Dunes Farm to remain a resource for those without the means to own their own ops. I regard there is potential for the op to lose this status if it in the hands of any one guild, the owner might quit game
, the guild's time and energy might need to be dedicated to internal issues, guild policies could change, some members could attack ops of either faction making it a legitimate target for counter attack despite the actions of those members would be at variance with policy of the guild itself - are many circumstances which could arise to threaten the status of the op as a community one as well as prevent it from serving its function as a community resource even while it does retain that status.
I believe a new structure is needed to address these issues, and the best I have come up with to date is as follows:
Loose Proposal One:
Roster the op itself on a weekly basis, with each owner donating 1-4 days output to others on the list (number of days depending on size of guild). What I like about this proposal is it gives ppl the chance to be the owners and the givers - to see how ops work, to feel a part of the op owning content, and be relieved of the role of welfare recipient which sits uncomfortably with many of us even if only for a short time.
Are costs - about 15 million for a week's ownership roughly, and practical issues re: thresholds etc, but it might also be alot of fun to have weekly battles against the npcs - or possibly set it up as beat the npcs and get the op for longer - a contest against the npcs to see which group can get the highest threshold - many practicalities to work out, but might be alot of fun to do it this way rather than by the roster the output method.
Loose Proposal Two:
Roster the output, but instead of one poor overworked bedraggled crafter (who needs Ani to dig mats for her so she can recover btw
) meeting with many each week, form a guild of alts of participating members. The leader resets HO and each can withdraw for themselves or themselves and one other - something akin to this where the distribution is handled directly by the participants without any one person or group needing to meet with many persons for direct hand ons or worry about omg I get none this week as my GH bulk was 10k (that happened LOL).
Both these methods would seem to address issues such as transparency and accountability and of great concern to me continuity as there seems far less risk of the op losing its status as a community one when it is managed by the recipients.
I would like ppl's thoughts and suggestions as there may be better ways to address the goals than the two proposals I outlined. I would also like those who regard themselves as likely participants to put forward their names as well.
Finally, while I am pre-empting Eley's proposal, Eley promised to return the op to me at any time I so wished, as I in turn had promised to return it to Mialee should he return to game and want it back. Most happily Mialee has returned to game
and it his wish that it be a community op rather than returned to him. I didn't own it personally and in my view neither did nor does Eleytheria own it. We were both caretakers of Mialee's gift to the community.
Eley as well as others are most welcome to put forward different proposals and I would like those within the op have not community to whom the op truly belongs to be those who choose the method we adopt for distributing its output.
Zysha

I believe a new structure is needed to address these issues, and the best I have come up with to date is as follows:
Loose Proposal One:
Roster the op itself on a weekly basis, with each owner donating 1-4 days output to others on the list (number of days depending on size of guild). What I like about this proposal is it gives ppl the chance to be the owners and the givers - to see how ops work, to feel a part of the op owning content, and be relieved of the role of welfare recipient which sits uncomfortably with many of us even if only for a short time.
Are costs - about 15 million for a week's ownership roughly, and practical issues re: thresholds etc, but it might also be alot of fun to have weekly battles against the npcs - or possibly set it up as beat the npcs and get the op for longer - a contest against the npcs to see which group can get the highest threshold - many practicalities to work out, but might be alot of fun to do it this way rather than by the roster the output method.
Loose Proposal Two:
Roster the output, but instead of one poor overworked bedraggled crafter (who needs Ani to dig mats for her so she can recover btw

Both these methods would seem to address issues such as transparency and accountability and of great concern to me continuity as there seems far less risk of the op losing its status as a community one when it is managed by the recipients.
I would like ppl's thoughts and suggestions as there may be better ways to address the goals than the two proposals I outlined. I would also like those who regard themselves as likely participants to put forward their names as well.
Finally, while I am pre-empting Eley's proposal, Eley promised to return the op to me at any time I so wished, as I in turn had promised to return it to Mialee should he return to game and want it back. Most happily Mialee has returned to game

Eley as well as others are most welcome to put forward different proposals and I would like those within the op have not community to whom the op truly belongs to be those who choose the method we adopt for distributing its output.
Zysha