The Yrkanis Shielding Act

[vguerin]

You were in the wrong. Suck it up.

Choosing sides with the biggest ganker now ? Fasinus was the main one to finish his crafing, then kill anyone tagged before he left. He was not defenseless, he was waiting on his chance like he has every other time. If your not someone that wears a tag and suffers from his follies... why choose the side of the enemy (and head ganker) ? Thats not neutral or peaceful, it empowers him to keep it up because there is always someone who don't get it and lends him a hand and make him think it's ok.

[marct]

tagged player A nukes tagged player B, B does not act back. non tagged player C comes along and heals player B - player A is engaged in PvP, player B and C is not.
IF player B tries to nuke/kick player A, then player C cant heal player B (or A) - player A and B is engaged in PvP, player C is not

Seems like a loophole to me too. I thought there was a new rule coming soon that if you are killed in PvP and have to respawn, you can't do it to the region you were killed in.

In your example PvP player B does not have to undertake this if there is a neutral around to heal them. Doesn't seem right. If they didn't want this to happen, they should turn their tag off.


@Keiko: Player B just has to turn off their tag and take the 30 seconds to do that to be able to not participate in your idea of RolePlay. Heck they turned the stupid thing on in the first place.

[weeman07]

wasnt going to say anything here as i knew it would only be me getting annoyed, but what the hell.
@DT
you may be roleplaying, but your message is simple, you are openly promoting ganking of kami in hp gear or focus.
The fact nearly every kara is going along with it makes me laugh, you are all so stupid as to follow DTs never ending (aprently RP) moanings, thankfully there are always those people with morals and brain who can read past the rubish you post.

If i made a thread saying that every kami was going to attack every kara in a kami city there would be outrage, but if you hide it in roleplay its okay?

Im posting here mainly to express my genral annoyence with karavans for going along with this stupid plan but also because i have had some crappy news today about some of the best players on atys leaving cos of this policy.

gratz DT you are messing everyones gameplay up.

oh and btw i have no problem with a kos poicy of any kami equiped with a weapon

[marct]

Oh come on. You have to be kidding.

1. If they like PvP and only if they like PvP did they need to turn their tag on in the first place.

2. Once you know about the RP stance, all you have to do is take the 30 seconds to disable your tag on the way in. Do that and you get nothing but smiles. I am sure there are some exceptions, as in some people would be jerks to you, but the general rule is to be kind as they are just a homin.

3. Fasinus cannot cry about it, because he knew about it ahead of time, and openly acknowledged that he would cahllenge it. Even after being swatted once, he still did not take his tag off. That is ALL he had to do.

Lastly, I fully support the stance, and I do not feel I am being ignorant, childish or spoiling anyones fun when I can give them a very easy way out. In fact I even give them that opportunity.

Maybe you say I'm not as good a person as I could be. If you think that, fine. I am a better person than that, I know it, and that is all that matters. I choose to play a game a certain way, and that really isn't the person I really am, in more ways than one.

I hope no one really leaves over this, and I would encourage them to speak to me if it is an issue for them. There opinion is just as valuable as mine. It seems someone just told me something similar to that the other day.

Noin.

[kazaam31]

Actually, it took about 2 mins after proper defense force showed up to take you down (and stop you from ganging up on lower level players) the other hour and 55 mins was watching four silly kami's get obliterated again and again as they made futile attempts to penetrate the city defenses.

oh yea be proud! You killed us 8+ vs 4 *clap* *clap* .. but what if u are alone without kara friends behind ? well i think we all know the result....*fear* *nuke* *down*

ah and gratz to ur shield coz it worked yesterday... there´s just a lil prob... yrk is ours most of the day thanks to the time diff...

[katriell]

....*fear* *nuke* *down*

How very boring...

[ajsuk]

Just to clarify. I think I could safely say the Karavan know what this Act is and stands for, RP or not. Maybe you could try and find some other side of the argument to poke at because moaning about our inclusion of RP is just pathetic.

[uhuhu]

who's the best homin of Atys? SumSum?

[oldmess]

If i made a thread saying that every kami was going to attack every kara in a kami city there would be outrage, but if you hide it in roleplay its okay?

Actually, Hellraiser said as much in this thread that he and others would make the same policy and apply it to all Kami towns, not just one like we are. And the outrage level? Pretty much zero. Nada. None. So, you're wrong about that.

And, you're distorting it: It's not every Kami. It's every armed (PvP tagged Kami. Disarm (turn off your tag) and we have no desire to fight you even if we could. I know that seems like a minor point, but it's really not. It's the point.

Im posting here ... because i have had some crappy news today about some of the best players on atys leaving cos of this policy.

Are you serious? All they have to do is turn off their tags and it's a non-issue. But, we're ruining their gaming by this? Not the lack of content. But the fact that they indicate they want PvP and we try to give them some and put some context to it?

[rushin]

who's the best homin of Atys? SumSum?

presumably ur responding to Kye's comment, and yes Sum and Uma are among the best (nicest, good for community, always helping out and having fun, etc) ppl in this community.

It's another bleak week for Zorai