Jayla wrote: but at the end of the day, who cares, the server will be up, we'll all be there, so lets just pppppppppplay!
Jayla
Hear Hear! Wipe or no wipe im sure as hell itchin' to play this game again!
Jayla wrote: but at the end of the day, who cares, the server will be up, we'll all be there, so lets just pppppppppplay!
Jayla
Because it is. Simply said, for me, the levels are (a) part of my character. They are a numeric value that reflect my character abilities and how she can interact with the world and with other players, starting from the moment since she was conceived to date. These abilities reflect how I have spent my (IG) live, what are my hobbies, what can I do as a craftsman and what is beyond my power. They aggregate whether I spent my time in a Matisian library studying to pass the "Magician apprentice" rite with Sirgio, or whether I spend my afternoons in a Thesos bar before reaching maturity. They reflect wether I am clumsy or not with magic or a pick, whether I can wield a dagger or, if the game mechanics allowed, whether I am good at trading or selling, if I can sing, dance, or if I have additional hobbies. Levels (as a shorthand for a numerical value that reflects the abilities) are an integral part of my character, much as my diplomas or degrees are in Real Life, and they show accomplishment and experience. Levels are as much part of my character as the name, the race or age.arfindel wrote:I fail to understand why people think that losing their levels equals losing their character.
The character is a abstract "whole", that happens to be represented (for interaction and manipulation purposes) in bytes, as much as it could be in a sheet of paper, or a common understanding between participating players of the whole. The character has attributes, abilities, experiences.The character is an entity we have in ourselves, not a bunch of bytes
No, Faa will be a copy of Faa (provided that no one grabs the name, just for fun). The second Faa will not have helped the construction of temples, will not be able to tell her granchildren how she defeated the Kitin Destroyer, and will cheat if she says that the name on the statue stating how well she did in the dig race is herself. If you use the same name, same race, same hairstyle, surely no other *player* will be able to tell the difference. In that case, why call it Faa? call it Faa2, and play the same. Other players will know that Faa2 is played by the player whose login is arfindel.about it, Faa will still be Faa, no mistake.
I'll agree with that.. Id rather come back to Kami domination, theres nothing wrong with being the underdogs.. Ya it will be hell at times, but it will also be even better when we win back some of the OPs.d29565 wrote:Oh, Kami were dominating. Well then, definitely can't have a server wipe then!
I see your point, and a very valid one. What I understand is that what we call the character is very much a question of personal perception. I don't mind if Faa is cloned and I don't relate her to any levels and practical achievements, I don't mind if she gets 3 digging masters erased and I can recreate her with exactly same appearance.iphdrunk wrote:Because it is. Simply said, for me, the levels are (a) part of my character. They are a numeric value that reflect my character abilities and how she can interact with the world, and other players, since she was conceived, to date. .
Ani answered it very well, but I'd still like to give my own version of it. Apologies that it's basicly the same thing she said.arfindel wrote:I fail to understand why people think that losing their levels equals losing their character.
Faa, your logic is impeccable, but logic has no part in this. The attachent to a toon defies logic. However hard I try to replicate Ffi in character creation, there will always be something that is "not quite right". Such was the case on Aniro, a conversation Sara and I had at great length, iirc. We both made replicas of Sar and Ffi respectively, but they were not Sar and Ffi. And why? It boils down to the one line I have quoted from you post above (not just the slight physical changes in character creation), namely that the "bump on the head" scenario is remarkably similar to the "but it was all just a bad dream ..." gimmick used by bad novellists. No-one belives it, it doesn't feel right, and it's cheap and unsatisfying at an emotional level.arfindel wrote: ... Faa will be up on her feet, maybe after some concussion that made her forget all the spells on 4 branches she once learnt ...