Re: To all PvPers
Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:50 am
lol dont you just adore lover's tiffs.zarozina wrote:ah ... the wriggling
lol dont you just adore lover's tiffs.zarozina wrote:ah ... the wriggling
From entertaining pap to just paprundll32 wrote:degenerating from what...*yawn*
The SEED's website was down but I found this cached.ffxjosh wrote:If you want a game where theres no PvP I would recommend Seed (oh dear, wait. What happened to that game!!!).
SEED CLOSES DOWN Runestone has regrettably filed for bankruptcy
ahh, thats a shame. Seed was a good (if not very buggy) non PvP game. had a great idea but i think lack of combat made it a very undesirable world for the majority..riveit wrote:The SEED's website was down but I found this cached.
Big difference between lack of PvP and lack of combat.ffxjosh wrote:ahh, thats a shame. Seed was a good (if not very buggy) non PvP game. had a great idea but i think lack of combat made it a very undesirable world for the majority.
The bugs and the non-combatness, plus they hadn't implemented half the stuff they promised at the time of release, was the first game the company made... hmmm sounds familiar?ffxjosh wrote:ahh, thats a shame. Seed was a good (if not very buggy) non PvP game. had a great idea but i think lack of combat made it a very undesirable world for the majority..
Sure. i know that. Did you assume i was comparing no PvP to no Combat? Sometimes Jy you can be so patronizing.grimjim wrote:Big difference between lack of PvP and lack of combat.
Given the discussion was about PvP and SEED was brought up which had zero combat of any kind... yes. That would generally be assumed by the usual class of opponent to be some sort of 'hadoken' in such a discussion.ffxjosh wrote:Sure. i know that. Did you assume i was comparing no PvP to no Combat? Sometimes Jy you can be so patronizing.