Ryzom

swe999 wrote:May be immature but the kinchers are there for a reason.
Can't turn off DP from kinchers because it would encourage that sort of dragging behavior.

if there was no DP from kinchers, I can forsee players dragging aggro into fights with the intention of dying to the kinchers in order to deny 'honor' to their opponents.

thereby displaying the absence of any honor of their own, but does anyone think Im wrong ?

This exercise is bringing out the absolute worst behaviour in the community.

spazmo wrote:Sorry to dissapoint you but i have been here for nearly a year and have 5 skills at 250 the reason for so few posts is because of things like this and yes my english is bad but embarrasing somebody here or in game is also part of the CoC so please dont make fun of me it is niether funny or called for.

***Content removed: Use of foul language and insulting other users is not permitted on these public message boards. Please respect our Forum Rules and Code of Conduct.***

final60 wrote:***Content removed: Use of foul language and insulting other users is not permitted on these public message boards. Please respect our Forum Rules and Code of Conduct.***

Bah all i said was bum.

/pass wind in cats face

*inhales* aaaaaaah the great outdoors

catfud wrote:*inhales* aaaaaaah the great outdoors

yer great outdoors , pisssssh..come ere.. *sits on your face*

swe999 wrote:May be immature but the kinchers are there for a reason.
Can't turn off DP from kinchers because it would encourage that sort of dragging behavior.

The person doing the dragging ends up with no dp. The faction that its dragged to usually dies. The draggers faction survives and then he gets rezed. The only people who acutally pretty much are guaranteed no DP are the ones on the side of the dragger.

vguerin wrote:I think if you check the official Q&A somewhere it says the same thing. In a PvP zone that conduct is not illegal... I believe this was brought up in a Q & A concerning Outposts...

People can get in an uproar, but it's been addressed...

So this is considered ok by nevrax? We'll those few times I got agroed by myself i guess I should have been within the rules and run towards any red dot I could find

Thread closed due to repeated use of offensive and foul language. As outlined in our Forum Rules and Code of Conduct, please always try to stay calm and mature, even if you disagree with another user with all your heart. That's essential, in order for everyone to be able to enjoy participating in discussions here on these public message boards.

vguerin wrote: I think if you check the official Q&A somewhere it says the same thing. In a PvP zone that conduct is not illegal... I believe this was brought up in a Q & A concerning Outposts...

Below is the paragraph you were looking for, taken from this Q&A:

8. [world GvG]: wouldn't this mean that an attacking force could simply use some sort of kamikaze-strategy? Example: Attackers stand and wait or just run and hide somewhere far from the outpost while one elected homin of their team goes to nearest group of mean aggro-mobs, uses invul and drags them to the camp. If this dont kill the defence Im sure its a pretty good way of weakening them... or even so, if the attacking force would close in while the aggros are in the outpost, but stand far enough away not to get the aggro and then start nuking the defence... I hope they make this forbidden. [Submitted by jinnear (EN)]

Sure, the attackers could use this strategy, but the defenders too. And as the NPCs themselves won't be aggro by mobs, there would still be some work to do...

Since the above quote was related to a specific situation, please keep in mind that we always deal with such situations on a case-by-case basis. There's a difference between making use of valid strategies in order to achieve a tactical advantage in combat and behaviour designed to ruin the fun for other players.