Ryzom

zyran wrote:The fact is.. PVP is in. It is setup the way the devs have decided to set it up. If you do not like the way it is set up.. yell at the devs, not the players that are playing within the rules of the game.

exactly not to mention the game was desighned with PvP in mind and dont make me go kill Baldy in his Pinkarmor!!!!!!

IF your status was determined by whether or not you weild a pick, people would just use it to "fake out" their opponents. You shouldn't just be able to flick on or off PvP.

splatula wrote:IF your status was determined by whether or not you weild a pick, people would just use it to "fake out" their opponents. You shouldn't just be able to flick on or off PvP.

Now... do tell... because I'm really curious after seeing so many folks suddenly jump from the stance of "the game population is mature and civilized" that some of them took in the recent threads railing against the planned and current implementation of pvp... to the "it's here and deal with it" one that seems to be so popular suddenly...

but hey, perhaps one of these PvP gods supporting a system of harvesters being fair game could explain something to me. I'm sure that there is obviously some gaping flaw in my very reasonable logic as to why harvesters should be off limits... so please spell it out very clear to me.

.
..
...
....
.....
......
.......
........
.........
..........
.........
........
.......
......
.....
....
...
..
.
exactly how do you suppose a neutral harvester is going to attack you?

um... they could try to blow you up

Guys this is badly off-topic. I do believe the topic has run it's course so I will close this thread. But feel free to start another thread to discuss this hot debate.