Page 7 of 7
Re: Are you all mad ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:06 pm
by stijn
vguerin wrote:Your sig is longer than folks that have stuck to this game since beta and you are on a free-trial and not supporting the game or the community. "Your" community is on the island, thats where your opinion should stay as well.
Oh great DT, good plan to scare our newbies away
Re: Are you all mad ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:11 pm
by vguerin
stijn wrote:Oh great DT, good plan to scare our newbies away
Someone on free-trail for 4 months is not a newbie, just a non-paying user.
Re: Are you all mad ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 9:39 pm
by aude03
Doubletap wrote:Your sig is longer than folks that have stuck to this game since beta and you are on a free-trial and not supporting the game or the community. "Your" community is on the island, thats where your opinion should stay as well.
Doubletap wrote:Someone on free-trail for 4 months is not a newbie, just a non-paying user.
I rarely have a real LOL, thanks DT
The best welcome post, from the guy who cares the most for our community
Go ahead DT.....go ahead...save this game.
And for your information, maybe people just cant pay 15 bucks a month for a game, or just for a forum, like you
Re: Are you all mad ?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:23 pm
by archerke
vguerin wrote:Your sig is longer than folks that have stuck to this game since beta and you are on a free-trial and not supporting the game or the community. "Your" community is on the island, thats where your opinion should stay as well.
OH MY GOD ....
Re: Had GREED become you?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:34 pm
by great83
killgore wrote:Are you so glad to see me unhappy with life on Atys? Want a shovel to through dirt on my corpse?-Kil
Hmmm where you glad to see others unhappy on atys cause of verbal assaults on them that you participated in? I am sad to hear you are unhappy kil and sorry that you cant find the same joy within yourself anymore... but in the end i think your unhappiness is/was caused by your own actions not other people or the game itself so i feel no sympathy for you. But i am glad to see you might take a bit of time and review your actions and words and see how they were perceived and effected other happiness.
Re: Had GREED become you?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:39 pm
by bf649ztp
They certainly have a very large sig and a very strong opinion for someone that has been on the island for 4 months. DT is being very harsh as DT always is. personally i set my watch to DT cos I know how he'll react to any given situation (it's usually with a large pinch of bitterness). But this has been the way for over 2 years now. 4 months is a very long time for a freebie, come and join us in then 'real world' Sher where you can bash DT without fear of reprisal
Kodel.
Re: Had GREED become you?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 10:41 pm
by riveit
bf649ztp wrote:May need Riveits comprehensive library of who attacked what and when here, but i'm sure a while ago a KA guild DID attack a community OP.
No, that is incorrect Kodel. None of the Community outposts have been attacked by the KA or by anyone else, as far I as know.
I would like to make an another correction of fact in this thread. The KA owns 15 outposts - not 20 or 16 as two previous posters have stated. Phaedreas' Tears is not a KA member. Fifteen of the total twenty-eight outposts is 53.6% of the outposts. Yes, KA has more high level outposts, been there done that discussion.
Re: Had GREED become you?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:00 pm
by great83
riveit wrote:No, that is incorrect Kodel. None of the Community outposts have been attacked by the KA or by anyone else, as far I as know.
I would like to make an another correction of fact in this thread. The KA owns 15 outposts - not 20 or 16 as two previous posters have stated. Phaedreas' Tears is not a KA member. Fifteen of the total twenty-eight outposts is 53.6% of the outposts. Yes, KA has more high level outposts, been there done that discussion.
Hmm to figure out who owns more or less it is best to give each op a value based on the QL of the cats, hence a ql 250 op is alot more important then a ql 50... there should be a total value of 4800, last time i did the math (which was recent) it came to about 3100 i think that was under the control of the KA and 900 under kami control... and rest was neutral and community ops... so by my math the KA owned about 70% of the value of Ops... and that is just if we go by the ql of the cats... which in my eyes gives a far better view of who is dominating the OPs...
Re: Had GREED become you?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:05 pm
by bf649ztp
riveit wrote:No, that is incorrect Kodel. None of the Community outposts have been attacked by the KA or by anyone else, as far I as know.
As far as you know or as far as you have a record?. Do not start abusing your position as archivist for the sake of your beliefs or faction Riveit that would suck. People have come to rely on your records and I would like clarification and a record of this before this is true. I thought that an attack WAS made by the KA on a community OP, but i'm not sure. I only deferred to riveit because of his meticulous record keeping in this game. Please make this a certainty or a belief...it matters Riveit..well to me anyway, and maybe to all those people you try and prove right or wrong in those posts of yours.
Re: Had GREED become you?
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:10 pm
by boroshi
Thread locked.
I had hoped that everyone could get over the bitterness and discuss this sensibly and calmly but still some people (thankfully the minority) insist on being antagonistic.
Edit:
Both threads have been continuing on a couse which was only causing further arguments. While neither you nor anyone else who had 'recently' replied to either thread was grossly offtopic or offensive, posts that had been made since my previous check on the forums had been even more antagonistic than previously. Therefore in the interests of calm discussion on the forums, and after a quick discussion amongst the Community Managers, they were closed. If you wish to start a new thread (and please, only one) to continue to discuss the issue calmly, you may of course do so.
I apologise for any inconvenience caused by the closure of these threads and remind everyone to stick to the
Forum Rules and Netiquette.
Thanks,