Ryzom

http://img120.imageshack.us/img120/5751/kamic01mu0.jpg

Disclaimer: The conversation pictured in this image is not to be construed as an educational indication of actual practices or thoughts Kami would have.

huntar wrote:but behaviour intended to annoy players is forbidden by the CoC (IIRR).. so false declarations, and attacks that arent followed up after the 3rd round but still require the defenders to wait around the OP for another hour and a half, do nothing but breed ill-will within the community, leading on to retaliatory attacks and the entire degenerating spiral.

Good OP battles are a lot of fun, and they are usually the ones with a solid turn out on both sides. its the one sided battles which are a drag and a headache to participate in.

think of it this way.
We PvP with each other, not against

Quoted for emphasis. If only I had anymore room left in my signature, I'd quote and/or link that.

do you want a challenging battle, or just a cheap kill of someone wearing focus gear ?

Of course i want a challenging battle, thats why me and my companion didnt run when we were "heavily out numbered" (3 against 2) in nexus yesterday

false declarations, and attacks that arent followed up after the 3rd round

I dont like it too but there is nothing i can do to change it. But at least what i can do is not to start to whine. I wont even start to flame who did this tactic few weeks ago. I can live with it. IF you cant, dont attend OP.

To say

behaviour intended to annoy players is forbidden by the CoC

is to say nothing, cause what annoys me not necessary annoys you.

is it just me, or does it seem that tha Kami players care more about winning at all costs, while the Karavan want a good fight?

Or am I just biased because I'm in a Kara guild..... that got a price on our heads...

audrimas wrote:To say

behaviour intended to annoy players is forbidden by the CoC

is to say nothing, cause what annoys me not necessary annoys you.

Not really. It has nothing to do with whether it annoys the end-recipient or what the end-recipient feels is annoying. It matters whether the instigator intended the action to annoy.

Sorry its taken me a while to post on this, but i was the one who also suggested the break. Yes we may have many more OP's at the moment, but a break is needed. I wouldnt mind finishing jewl craft, and doing all these OP battles is stopping that. I also wouldnt mind getting a bit of guild time, working on teaching new players. It died down after last easters craze and i hope it will do the same after today

danlufan wrote:Sorry its taken me a while to post on this, but i was the one who also suggested the break. Yes we may have many more OP's at the moment, but a break is needed. I wouldnt mind finishing jewl craft, and doing all these OP battles is stopping that. I also wouldnt mind getting a bit of guild time, working on teaching new players. It died down after last easters craze and i hope it will do the same after today

*idiot poster mode ON*

Oo OotN asking for a break !!!!

japamala wrote:is it just me, or does it seem that the Kami players care more about winning at all costs, while the Karavan want a good fight?

Or am I just biased because I'm in a Kara guild..... that got a price on our heads...

The kami care more about winning yes, because we have alot more to win, why would anyone start attacking outposts when they owned far far more outposts than the other "side".

The kami currently own 3 Q250 ops, the karavan own 5 (altho depending on the results of todays attack by ootn that could be changed), 0 Q200 outposts, 5 owned by karavan, 3owned by neutrals.
Why would the karavan really be attacking? Untill their resent loss of GoJ's outpost they had a very stable situation of owned the majority of outposts.

And as for the karavan wanting a fair fight we all know thats not true, yes the kami have used "bad" tactics more often in the past, but we have so much more to attack about, on an added note we have Never used multiple attacks to even get past the first round of an OP war, gratz to OOTN on that....

aude03 wrote:*idiot poster mode ON*

*points and grins*

I think we can safely say this whole thread is just solo and keiko wanting a break, and the guild leaders wanting more fun.


End of story?

sprite wrote:*points and grins*

I think we can safely say this whole thread is just solo and keiko wanting a break, and the guild leaders wanting more fun.


End of story?

The idea was brought up in the kami alliance forums, a suprising amount wanted a break for one weekend, i dont like the idea of having a weekend off personally, but would love it if both factions could agree on a 6 hour period of the day where no attacks are allowed from either faction. (ofc each faction would have a different time they wanted to be safe)

sprite wrote:End of story?

i dont think so....it's a thread relative to OP, never saw such a thread stopping at only 7 pages