
Hope this continues,
Kibsy

Wouldn't it be simple then to just publish this list that the devs refer to when choosing which bugs to fix? Or is there a danger in publishing this list?As with every other development team, bugs have to be prioritized for fixing and testing. Naturally, the most harmful ones go to the top of the list, which means less pressing bugs get pushed down the list.
What usually happens over time, then, is that you get a stack of low priority bugs that you have a hard time getting around to, because there always seems to be more pressing issues that need attention. So even though it may seem like a bug you reported headed off into the aether somewhere, it is still on the list. For obvious reasons, we just plain don't have the time to notify everyone who files a bug report of the resulting follow-up.
Or, to put it another way: We could do it, if you're willing to accept that I would have to use scarce resources to do so and less other work would get done because of it. No offense, but I choose to use those man-hours on other work.
...
While it is not necessarily a bad idea, again: Do you want me taking other work hours for this right now, resources that could go to fixing bugs? Keeping something like this running and current would be a full-time job for someone. I suppose I could shift someone from game dev or coding to do it...
We're working on it. The goal is to give you as complete info as possible befoe the patches are made, For emergency patches (as when we find a crash bug), that isn't always possible.xenofur wrote:
ah, something i forgot last time: do you think it could be possible to reduce so-called "stealth-patches" in the future? =)
I wouldn't call it a danger, but the list tends to change frequently, which is perfectly normal in a development situation; bugs get fixed daily. Better that we just give you a general idea of the major beats we are working on, so you can be prepared. For example, we are spending quite a bit of time on outposts right now, along with the normal bug fix routine.vinnyq wrote:Wouldn't it be simple then to just publish this list that the devs refer to when choosing which bugs to fix? Or is there a danger in publishing this list?