Page 5 of 7

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:37 pm
by dakhound
ok question answered............let the BS begin

..........oh damn it beat me here ;)

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:51 pm
by bgraz
vguerin wrote: Yet the conduct in question is going on @ Woodburn between Team Spirit and The Souls... We'd just like to know if it's okay for players to block OP's in this fashion...
unless you have inside information on this transaction, mabey the Soul are just letting TS be owners for a while so they can enjoy the status of owning a top level OP. you know Vguerin there are others in this game besides yourself and your alliance that would enjoy holding such a piece of realestate, but then again seems you have no regard for other so they are only trying to exploit 1 of 2 q250 OPs not held by your alliance

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:15 pm
by ajsuk
Several questions around the same subject to be asked and answered. Whats your issue? Not liking the flak about the same sorta things you lot used to get up to back in the day?

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:17 pm
by ajsuk
bgraz wrote:unless you have inside information on this transaction, mabey the Soul are just letting TS be owners for a while so they can enjoy the status of owning a top level OP. you know Vguerin there are others in this game besides yourself and your alliance that would enjoy holding such a piece of realestate, but then again seems you have no regard for other so they are only trying to exploit 1 of 2 q250 OPs not held by your alliance
everything in that post is wrong. :)

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:22 pm
by rundll32
ajsuk wrote:everything in that post is wrong. :)
lol! New forum sig...

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:26 pm
by ajsuk
rundll32 wrote:lol! New forum sig...
w00t!

FAME & GLORY! FOR THE REAPERS! :p

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:07 pm
by 0balgus0
vguerin wrote:Yet the conduct in question is going on @ Woodburn between Team Spirit and The Souls... We'd just like to know if it's okay for players to block OP's in this fashion...

Well, if names are going to be dropped, let's follow the Guild Registry of OPs thread for the actual guilds in question.

(Basically, it doesn't sound like TS is involved).

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:05 pm
by d29565
vguerin wrote: Yet the conduct in question is going on @ Woodburn between Team Spirit and The Souls... We'd just like to know if it's okay for players to block OP's in this fashion...
Team Spirit has not been involved in the actual exchange of the OP. In other words, we have not taken posession of Woodburn Stronghold...ever. Kindly get your information right before putting our name into something.

Edit: Team Spirit does send it's newer members as a way to learn what an OP battle is, and teach them what to do and what not to do.

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:31 pm
by arfindel
TS has never changed OP, or owned other OP since we merged with Emperor's Fist, 02 Apr 2006.

However I don't think it's exploit to change OP and raise thr (after all newbies have loads of fun fighting the NPCs).
I don't find it quite a tactics to be proud of if you do it on a regular base of course.

But I wonder why are you asking right now this on the forums... If I remember correctly you didn't win by war that Zorai OP and you never asked at that time if the community would agree on that or not :)

Re: (Officical CSR response requested) Growing pains...

Posted: Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:50 pm
by varelse
Marjo wrote:Outposts aren't supposed to belong to the same guild ad vitam eternam but should change of owner through wars or diplomacy to spice up guilds' activity.

This response would seem to indicate that any repeated use of the game mechanics with the intent to keep an outpost in the same hands forever, will be 'frowned upon' by the CSR team. I think that's a clear enough indication of what we can expect to be considered as fair play by our CSR team.

As I read this, it's apparently ok to peacefully transfer an outpost from time to time, as part of a diplomatic agreement, and it's ok to level the threshold while in the process of doing this, but only so long as the 'spirit of the law' is not violated, and that outpost is not permanently locked into the possession of one guild.