Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Want to talk about guilds, find a guild, brag about your guild's accomplishments? This is the place.
philu
Posts: 1308
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:00 am

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by philu »

vguerin wrote:By now you should know this was IC and was followed thru on...
I was simply pointing out that you yet again hide behind the IC tag to make an attack against other members of this forum.

vguerin wrote:OOC: Anyone can look back at your posts and see the spin doctor in action, it's time to see where things stand because your actions don't match your words. Lets see who is non-PvP and who is shaky on their RP... /OOC
What actions exactly are you talking about here? Please explain this because you're being too vague for me to understand your point of view.
Elder Of Atys (ask nicely and I'll do the breakdance for you!)

All posts are In Person (Not IC, not OOC, not Rp, just me!)

Chasing the DING!
katriell wrote:You can't "complete" the mainland. If one thinks one has seen or done everything there, one is kidding oneself. But be prepared to "get out what you put in," because the mainland does not coddle or hold hands.
User avatar
varelse
Posts: 327
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:42 am

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by varelse »

First of all, congratulations on your new alliance of close friends and trusted partners.

Now, my take on the grouping of 'neutral' guilds with roleplaying faction loyalist guilds... When you pick a side, you are not a neutral entity. I view anyone who allies with and supports Kami faction guilds as a Kami supporter, not a neutral entity.

Conversely, it makes very little sense for a truly loyal Kami or Karavan guild to ally with a neutral party. Either you will compromise your faction loyalty or you will compromise their neutral position, or both.

In any case, until global faction war is implemented, faction loyalty or lack thereof is still of relatively little relevance. When PvP based alliances can begin to influence which faction's players can teleport and respawn in whole regions, then we can expect to see people who formerly attempted to maintain a neutral image actually picking a side and fighting to keep the teleporters open for their factioned allies and friends.

I'm kind of curious to see if there's going to be any way at all for neutrals to return a given region to neutral and fight to keep it that way. Currently there is no pvp option at all for neutrals, and it's hard to see how they would be able to act directly to change the direction of events. Now, if the devs were to create an "agnostic" category and give them a pvp switch that allows them to attack pvp enabled players/spires from both factions... but I've wandered off topic.

Until faction war goes in, many workable alliances will still be formed mainly along the lines of friendship and trust rather than by faction. Only time will tell how these will be affected by the drastic faction related changes to the game.
iwojimmy
Posts: 967
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 10:00 am

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by iwojimmy »

Congratulations on the Alliance, I hope it works for you.
My personal stance is Karavan favoring, but neutral as a protest against the faction implementation. I still beleive that if people want to be forced into a simplistic bipolar conflict game system, they should play Counterstrike.
The Saga of Ryzom is about the Homins, not the Kami or Karavan, and I hope to endure in the game long enough to see this FvF novelty fade away and become just another facet of the world - not its focus.
User avatar
katriell
Posts: 2479
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 1:36 am

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by katriell »

iwojimmy wrote:Congratulations on the Alliance, I hope it works for you.
My personal stance is Karavan favoring, but neutral as a protest against the faction implementation. I still beleive that if people want to be forced into a simplistic bipolar conflict game system, they should play Counterstrike.
The Saga of Ryzom is about the Homins, not the Kami or Karavan, and I hope to endure in the game long enough to see this FvF novelty fade away and become just another facet of the world - not its focus.
If the majority did not want FvF, they wouldn't do FvF. There wouldn't be bands of PvP-enabled players looking for blood in towns, or outposts turning into a faction war without any mechanics dictating they must be.

If FvF is the "focus," it is because players have made it that way.
Jelathnia, Kasarinia, KianShi, Maethro, ShuaLi, and OPaxie (Arispotle)
TeiJeng (Leanon)

ï = ALT+0239 | advice for mission design | Zoraï masks
long-distance communication | some foods and drinks | Zoraï pictograms
"Ryzom: We dare to be different. Do you dare to adapt?" - Acridiel
User avatar
kostika
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:48 pm

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by kostika »

katriell wrote:If the majority did not want FvF, they wouldn't do FvF. There wouldn't be bands of PvP-enabled players looking for blood in towns, or outposts turning into a faction war without any mechanics dictating they must be.

If FvF is the "focus," it is because players have made it that way.
Do not mistake people doing it for them asking for it. There is a big differance.

Just because someone does something, it may not be because they asked for it or want it, but because it is the only thing to do.
~Kostika
Guild Leader of The Samsara
Atys Guardian

Stand and Deliver!!
User avatar
komissar
Posts: 941
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:20 pm

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by komissar »

Well alliance or no alliance, but at the outpost defence in FF last nite virtually every kami guild has shown up.

It seemeв to me that the samsara itself was the least numerous of the defenders LOL. But I must say that Jyudas and Miouette's raids into our healer's tranks have been quite a pain :)

I really started to hate that Aen armor LOL

Having your head chopped off every couple of minutes by a sneaky melee guy is not the best fate a healer could wish :)

Anyways it was fun And I would like to thank the defenders for it.
Komissar
Komizaur (Silan rep.)

"A fond memory" of the "Order of the Nameless"
Matisian Botanist: "Complete Atlas of Atysian Flora (work in progress)"
Devoted Scholar of the "Zorai pictograms" "Zorai pictographic Signatures on demand"
Author of "The Kitin Scriptures" "The Kitin Scriptures WEBCOMIC!!!"
"Яussians may die - but never give up!"

sidusar
Posts: 1331
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:38 am

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by sidusar »

marct wrote:I think this is the only point I have contested here. This statement is not true if they are in a defensive pact with Kami supporters. They are not fighting for dappers here, they are not being mercenaries... They are supporting Kami.

If they are trading with Kami supporters, and giving them the means to become stronger, that is supporting the Kami as well.

Noin.
So you believe the only way to remain neutral is not have any dealing whatsoever with anyone who is either Kami or Karavan? Trading usually benefits both parties, so trading with them supports them. Hunting with them helps them get experience and supports them. Just hanging out with them might cause them to have fun which is supporting them.

"neutral" in Ryzom doesn't mean "going to any length to stay out of any fighting", it simply means not wanting to support either the Kami or the Karavan. A neutral party could still want to fight for their own interests, and if helping a group of Kami worshipper is in their own best interest, then I'd fully expect them to do so. That the Kami benefit from it as well would just be irrelevant side consequences to the neutrals. Whereas a truely Kami-aligned party should help the other Kami worshippers because it benefits the Kami, even if it goes against their own interest.
kostika wrote:Do not mistake people doing it for them asking for it. There is a big differance.

Just because someone does something, it may not be because they asked for it or want it, but because it is the only thing to do.
There's nothing about outposts that dictates they must be FvF. The spires were designed for the faction versus faction combat, the outposts for the guild versus guild. A Karavan guild taking an outpost doesn't benefit the Karavan, it benefits the guild.

Guilds allying to work together is a natural result, ofcourse, but it was the players that choose to put all Karavan guilds in one alliance and all Kami guilds in the other. To me it seems a little unnatural. I'd expect the Karavan zealots to attack outposts of Kami aligned guilds at every opportunity, but the more moderate Karavan followers to sometimes aid the more fanatical and sometimes oppose them. But no, we seem to have a situation where all Karavan guilds aid eachother without question, and same for all Kami.

The result is that a neutral guild either has to ally with a side or perish. If one Karavan/Kami guild attacks you, the whole side will, and your only chance is to have the other side help you. It's the players that choose to use outposts this way, not Nevrax.

Hopefully when spires are added, the FvF will focus on them and away from outposts.
sk8rss
Posts: 193
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 9:40 am

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by sk8rss »

I'm burning myself replying here, as this thread appears hot! In any case, I aplaud the alliance. The neutrals are choosing the right people to defend, and it appears the Karavan are just jealous cause nobody likes them. Seriously though, (that part was sorta tounge-in-cheek) I do respect the alliance as it stands. I'd throw my new guild (Divine Order of Kamihood) up there to join in, but the possibility of it being open to Karavan guilds as well turns me off to involvment. Good luck with such an alliance, and may it not be tainted by Jena's lifeless followers.
Liquado ~ Zorai
Harvester of Materials,
Crafter of stuff,
Caster of (few) spells,
Killer of vile creatures

Guild Leader
Divine Order of Kamihood
User avatar
kostika
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 6:48 pm

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by kostika »

sk8rss wrote:I'm burning myself replying here, as this thread appears hot! In any case, I aplaud the alliance. The neutrals are choosing the right people to defend, and it appears the Karavan are just jealous cause nobody likes them. Seriously though, (that part was sorta tounge-in-cheek) I do respect the alliance as it stands. I'd throw my new guild (Divine Order of Kamihood) up there to join in, but the possibility of it being open to Karavan guilds as well turns me off to involvment. Good luck with such an alliance, and may it not be tainted by Jena's lifeless followers.

(replying IC as this sounds IC to me)

We chose to be allied with our friends. The fact that many are Kami doesn'tactually come into it. Yes the alliance is kami/neutral. But when your guild is based in a Kami land your friends jsut might end up being kamists most the time.

No Karavan guilds have approached us. And ya know what? I seriously doubt any will. Besides, I can only think of one Karavan guild I'd like to a in this alliance and my guild is already allied with them. (and I doubt they'd join the alliance for thier own reasons anyhow)

We are friends allied to help each other. Assume what you like, but just because our friends are Kamists, that does not make us Kamists.

(that last part isn't directed at you Liquado)
~Kostika
Guild Leader of The Samsara
Atys Guardian

Stand and Deliver!!
turnbull
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 4:58 pm

Re: Announcing a new alliance - Guardians

Post by turnbull »

ooc/
Ok. here's my two pence worth.
I am an old school RP'er and have just recently moved to Ryzom after having a break from 'traditional' mmo RP offerings that quite frankly don't do RP anf justice.
I did however like UO and now Ryzom!!!! At last I can roleplay with a strong game mechanic and gorgeous world to back it up. :)

Anyway back to my point, to me neutral does not mean that you cannot take a side in a fight or battle it just mean that you don't follow the other way or life/philosphy etc. Eg I'm not religeous at all but if I saw someone on the street who I know to be very religeous getting a kicking I would step in and help him defend himself. This doesn't make me religeous.

other than that all I will say for the time being till I know more about the lore and history of the game and the alliance is it may help to think of neutrals as 'freelance' guilds, think about it for a few mins. :)

See you all ingame. Name Preasul.
Post Reply

Return to “Guilds”