What bugs you the most?
It's not really bugging me "most", but the fact that thread started in February 2006, it has 30+ pages of interesting suggestions - some of them being redundandant - and yet personally I can't help thinking that it feels like talking to a wall, being reluctant to keep on posting, without mentioning that new posters may not considering re-reading a 6 months old with 300+ posts before posting.
As much as I am aware of the upcoming ring release and the stakes around it, it hardly justifies not taking a few minutes to communicate on "filtered" feedback this thread has generated, rejected / accepted / for further study/... suggestions and updated "in development" sections with retained improvements, even with a bulleted list saying "* inventory is sorted automatically" or "* identical items are now stacked".... I cannot but grin when this thread gets another *valid* post re-stating things like "allow cut & paste from different hands" or "allow selecting an icon for extraction stanzas" or "fix the seed icon to be the same", etc. which have been suggested, reported and ticketed systematically for the past 18 months.
<rant>
So here I am, raising the same concern again: Nevrax / official communication. Given the nature of the community, it is unfortunate that this aspect has worsened: we've gone from developer chats, direct feedback, planned features, executive letters, Q&A, forum "watch" to the almost complete "silence radio" -- even the forums seem to only get CoC enforments posts by higher powers- with the notable exceptions of the highlighting of press releases concerning the Ring -- which, for those who have an idea of it, they hardly give anything new -- and when the forum / player noise is over a certain threshold we get a "bone to chew" in the form of a difuse, generic, almost vaporware announcement. I am not (at least this time) complaining about lack of features, which can be understood, but lack of communication, which cannot be justified by the old "focus on one task, release when quality is satisfactory, best use of internal limited resources" arguments.
</rant>