Page 4 of 5

Re: $oe

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:35 pm
by dakhound
lol uhm guys

getting carried away, SoE rumour is probs BS

Re: $oe

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:19 pm
by ajsuk
Hey Jack, would you mind summarizing that previous post for me? :p

Re: $oe

Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:37 pm
by muadhib
muadhib wrote: I will welcome any company with open arms that keeps my favorite MMO game up and running.
Quoted for emphasis. :P

Re: $oe

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:03 am
by ffxjosh
dakhound wrote:lol uhm guys

getting carried away, SoE rumour is probs BS

Considering the french courts still dont know who owns Ryzom (hence making GF pay outa their own pcoket to keep the servers up till they clear up this mess) it's HIGHLY unlikely that ANY bids are being 100% considered atm.

Add this tot he fact that *IF* SOE were going to buy Ryzom, there would be at least SOMETHING, somewhere.. but nope.

Plus Sony like to make money, something which neither company that has owned Ryzom has done.

Re: $oe

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:22 am
by great83
dakhound wrote:lol uhm guys

getting carried away, SoE rumour is probs BS
True it, most likely BS but SoE would be a god send for ryzom... soe has been manging mmo's longer then any other company. Yes they have had their slips but all companies have at least one in a good 10 year period... If SoE bought the game i knew there be a reason to log in at least once a month to check out the live updates, if they good or bad it is a change never less, currently i need change in ryzom... to stand still in one spot for to long is called being dead...

Re: $oe

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:17 am
by dlirious
fiach wrote:LOTRO is pretty good, it has a nice community and a more believable world than some other MMO's, You will NEVER find another game like Ryzom, it doesn't exist, so dont waste time looking for it :)
This is true...one doesn't exist. And lotro just pisses me off. :P

Re: $oe

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 7:04 am
by dakhound
great83 wrote:... to stand still in one spot for to long is called being dead...
I thought that was lagging/akf ;)

Re: $oe

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 8:14 am
by fiach
dakhound wrote:I thought that was lagging/akf ;)
There is a fairly common condition called Lag Death, but thats probably not whats meant here :)

Re: $oe

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:53 pm
by kekulus
Don't fret - if $OE wins the bid, then I will buy $OE.

No problem!

Re: $oe

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2007 12:37 pm
by muadhib
ffxjosh wrote:Considering the french courts still dont know who owns Ryzom (hence making GF pay outa their own pcoket to keep the servers up till they clear up this mess)
Hey mate, got any references to back up this statement?
Or is this just wild guessing on your side?

Cheers,
Fand