Page 4 of 7

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:41 pm
by komissar
dakhound wrote:can I also point out it was not the karavan who declared on this op last night

not the proper "caravan association" anyways
Thanks Jacko for pinting this out.

We can't be hold responsible for every karavan tagged player when that player has nothing to do with the majority of the Karavan...

We can't stop the guy from playing the game the way he sees fit either.

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:55 pm
by mikehh9
Is this a sanctioned "event" ? noob questions....

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 12:58 pm
by blaah
aardnebb wrote:*sigh*
i said "most" for a reason.

i meant no disrespect for kami player, but in "thread that is no more" was stated that most of the time kami guild dont have a glue what op is under attack (and something about destroying armor for nothing, cant win anyway, ...).

maybe attackers should be able to put 3 to 5 different attack times up, and defenders can chose one that suits best, then everyone can come ;-)

... or make op's non pvp with infinite number of guards, who kicks most guards in time frame wins :-)


btw, how many would skip RL to defend those last q250 kami outposts ?
... now ask why theres no such support for lower q outposts.

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:05 pm
by magick1
mikehh9 wrote:Is this a sanctioned "event" ? noob questions....
All OP (outpost) battles are player made "events", and as such not part of the official story or events.
The OPs were launched along with some official fluff, but they are in essence PvP content for guilds (along with allies, friends and what have you).

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:16 pm
by riveit
As a completely off-topic comment
final66 wrote:Anyone else see the end drawing near? :x
When I read this, I can't help but hear Jim Morrison singing

"This is the end

Beautiful friend

This is the end

My only friend, the end."

:D

It's a tribute to the Riders on the Storm!

/salute

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:29 pm
by apolo
I wasnt able to attend coz i keep having problems with my comp :(
Thx to all that helped our guild last night ;)
and ty for the song reveit :P
Hope to c u all soon

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:36 pm
by xeraphim
riveit wrote:As a completely off-topic comment



When I read this, I can't help but hear Jim Morrison singing

"This is the end

Beautiful friend

This is the end

My only friend, the end."

:D

It's a tribute to the Riders on the Storm!

/salute

*enourmous grin* :D

He gets it !

/bow riveit

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:38 pm
by komissar
mikehh9 wrote:Is this a sanctioned "event" ? noob questions....
Of course not.

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:30 pm
by philu
sprite wrote:Now is different to then, you'll noticed I said "is used"
Can't help but feel you're splitting hairs here. :rolleyes:

I suspect the point that Zok was making is that old phrase "let he who is without sin....".*

In what way exactly is a false declaration now different from a false declaration in the past?




* I'm not implying you or TNE have done it yourself here. I know better than that don't I? ;) But as I see it, you were speaking for the Karavan in that initial post and since Karavan guilds have done it too, you (as a Karavan) can hardly get on the moral highground.

Re: Atatck on Sai-Shun Stronghold

Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:43 pm
by marct
tigercha wrote:~snip~
The game is flawed, this is not a casual observation, its fact, playing a game that involves you having to be up 3 in the morning is seriously BROKEN
It in no way requires you to be up at that time. The defenders have opportunity to set a defense round at a time that is to their liking. That is why the mechanism is in place.