Ryzom

We've been Karavan since the first forming days of the Reapers, well over a year ago and NEVER anything else. If there has been any confusion in this I would like to think our actions have spoken for themselves. But it seems words are required.

As I read this list we are, and have been, listed under Karavan. I see us as listed under Karavan/(race) Neutral. Which, to be fair, is fair! We've members of all races and though we plan on becoming a mix of Matis and neutral citizens at the moment we have no citizenship but that doesn't mean we aren't followers of the Goddess.

ariwen wrote:So to everyone playing we are more nuetral then Karavan, so we cant be counted on because we really havent chosen side.

Not "everyone". Pegasus Foundation knows first-hand that the Reapers are good friends and allies and can be counted on. Actions speak louder than a list on a forum and you're guild's actions have always been exemplary to us.

ariwen wrote:This is just wrong, they need to add something to the list and not call us nuetral just because some of us dont wat to run around with our pvp flag on, nor do some of us want to get into role playing.

Almost none of my guild activates their PvP flag either. Random, open PvP isn't really that fun to us. I know others disagree with this, but stories of going afk and then finding you've been ganked just reinforce my opinion. But that doesn't mean we won't stand with out Karavan allies during OP battles; we will and have.

The OP battles and the open-PvP flag are 2 very different things. In fact, they kinda conflict a bit, but that's a rant for a different day.

ariwen wrote:they need to add something to the list and not call us nuetral just because some of us dont wat to run around with our pvp flag on, nor do some of us want to get into role playing.

"They" would be me, and the list is correct according to Ema. You are clearly classified as a Karavan cult, Neutral civ guild:

Karavan
Neutral
-Reapers of the Dark (Ema) - Matis based

The list relates to the ingame alignment of the guild and has nothing to do with the FvF flags that individual players may or mayt not activate.

Thank you sprite for restoring the russian alliance in the guild list.

However they are a matis based mati-citizenship guild. Their base is at Yrk and Grusper is basicly the only fyros there...

komissar wrote:However they are a matis based mati-citizenship guild. Their base is at Yrk and Grusper is basicly the only fyros there...

Ah ok, thanks for the correction

sprite wrote:"They" would be me, and the list is correct according to Ema. You are clearly classified as a Karavan cult, Neutral civ guild:The list relates to the ingame alignment of the guild and has nothing to do with the FvF flags that individual players may or mayt not activate.

Unfortunately you were not the one who stated to me after the OP battleless battle last night, that "Reapers are nuetral and wont get my support".

As Ema stated we have all civilizations in our guild, We are a Karavan guild, but our citizenship is not with any race yet. Unfortunately some people dont understand the way the list is created.

I am sorry I sounded so upset earlier.
Thank you for all your har work in compiling this list,

ariwen wrote:Unfortunately you were not the one who stated to me after the OP battleless battle last night, that "Reapers are nuetral and wont get my support".

For the record, neither me nor my guild have said anything like that. The "they" i was referring to was the "they need to add something".

ariwen wrote:Unfortunately you were not the one who stated to me after the OP battleless battle last night, that "Reapers are nuetral and wont get my support".

As Ema stated we have all civilizations in our guild, We are a Karavan guild, but our citizenship is not with any race yet. Unfortunately some people dont understand the way the list is created.

This is a very important list for the reasons you listed here... it's accuracy (though it doesn't reflect some guilds true nature/allies) is all many folks that are not paying attention to happenings have to base things on.

Hang in there...

sprite wrote:For the record, neither me nor my guild have said anything like that. The "they" i was referring to was the "they need to add something".

Sorry I misunderstood the 'they' part, and I know it was not you who said this. I do appologise if that is what I have insinuted. I offer you and your guild my apology.

vguerin wrote:(though it doesn't reflect some guilds true nature/allies)

I agree with you on this one DT, but I made the decision to only list the "actual" ingame alignment as shown on the fame window so that newer players would know who they could and couldn't join.