rushin wrote:hello Can you give an example?
Kk I mostly uses it above ground. When I be tracking fer exe mats only, it most often werks, tho thar do be de chance in 200 zones fer mission mats When I be tryin fer specific mat type, it usually werks (ie wood, seed, etc.) tho o' course de grade varies lots (cuz I puts de "up to exe" stanza in, jus in case I gits lucky ) When I say usually, I means aroun 9 out o' 10 times, in a place whar I gots mastery. Some chance o' failure be acceptable to me, e'en wit Webster's definition o' "mastery".
Wit all de followin', I uses terrain spec. When I looks fer "only excellent" and "wood" I be usually directed to de nearest, tho sumtimes farthest iffin I be usin 500m, source o' wood, typically a standard source field (basic-choice). Happens 8-9 times outta 10. Happens 100% o' de time when I be in wunna dem source fields when I starts trackin. Usin, say "only excellent" "Motega wood" yields de same result, e'en iffin de wood I finds be Abahaya. And at least once, usin de "only fine" and "amber" specs (I wer lookin fer a field fer grind mats) I wer lead to an exe Sha spot, wit NO other mats anywhar near, jus choice an' exe Sha. Dat wer de only pleasent surprise in o'er 10 months o' tracking (I experimented a bit afore submitting me problem, jus to make sher I werna doin it wrong). It don seem to matter iffin I uses e'en twice de cost to track in a place whar I be a supposed master, or wot permutations o' de bricks I mix together, when I be searchin fer sumptin specific success be about 10% fer me wit tracking.