I think that misinterpretation led your responses to focus against me. For instance #1. Yes I think that ranged is like staring at a wall now and #2 I think that even if damage and everything were fixed that it would still be like staring at a wall. Just because you are effective at killing things doesn't mean that it's going to be very exciting. So please reinterpret and respond in kind

What I'm also trying to get at is that yes, the one person who left doesn't matter. Tetra, nor the four or other five (figuratively) people who believe ranged is a top priority do not matter. Strictly from a business stand point. Because for every person who believes this is a number one priority there are hundreds of people who believe there are a hundred other things that need fixing well above ranged.
Just as an example, imagine everyone who plays in a big room. Cerest is at a podium and asks, "how many of you think outposts is a top priority? show of hands" nearly everyone is going to raise there hand.
Then Cerest asks "in lieu of the first question you are allowed to raise your hand a second time and it will change your vote..how many of you are in favor of range being revamped as top priority?" ....do you really think you're going to get a room full of hands over outposts?