Ryzom

didnt you guys re-take malmont like not so long ago Oo

win some, lose some,

I think it wasnt just numbers that did it this time, I saw the kami were disorganised and making some rather large mistakes. There were at times opportunities for you to press the attack but you let them pass. I also noticed a few of the kami "big hitters" were missing from the fights which was letting you down a bit.

(ding 25 pages tigers )

I still think there should be a small reward/fine for 1v1 pvp....

gendriks wrote:I still think there should be a small reward/fine for 1v1 pvp....

hehe then bet the guy you duel 10 dappers that you'll kick their butt

and there is a reward/loss for it

see, littletiger once beat me ina duel, his reward is he can run about proud of himself, my loss is he never shuts up about it

dakhound wrote:hehe then bet the guy you duel 10 dappers that you'll kick their butt

and there is a reward/loss for it

see, littletiger once beat me ina duel, his reward is he can run about proud of himself, my loss is he never shuts up about it

Err, wrong.
LittleTiger kicked your 250 ass with a 230 skill in a duel, with a quite high HP left. And you are aware you cant beat my sorry ass in a duel until you change your skills And now i never shut up about it

lol jacko, owned by a 1h noob

And Zahan, if its over in the next couple of weeks, then that will be a ten month long win button, still not much of a button so to speak.

tigrus wrote:Err, wrong.
LittleTiger kicked your 250 ass with a 230 skill in a duel, with a quite high HP left. And you are aware you cant beat my sorry ass in a duel until you change your skills And now i never shut up about it

how was I wrong, I said you beat me

I dont mind admitting a spearman can beat an axeman GJ tho tiger your grinding is paying off and I look forward to many more memorable battles like we have had over the past few weeks.

catch me IG tonight if you can mate(I mean send me a /tell by that btw)

grimjim wrote:Yes they were, as part of rebuilding the nations and reclaiming the land.

Hardly. But what I meant was that they just "appeared". There was no introduction (at least on Aris) and all the lore regarding them came afterwards.

correct me if I'm wrong but the whole lore that came with it was "your faction wants you to conquer the op's etc" then left the rest of that branch to become a player driven story (as you often ask for)

it introduced a political climate that trancended the factions and created alliances that would not normally have come to pass within the lore. Each and every guild was left to carve their path and some decided to stand together to fight as one. In reaction to the alliance the opposition formed their own alliance to fight this.

see player driven story

aardnebb wrote:Umm, except there _arent_ that many. Stop making snide comments for the sake of it with no content.

lol you mean like you your posts do have any?

As Jack said, you managed to take back Malmont and before that defended many previous outpost attacks perfectly fine...

Its only _very_ recently you've lost any and as shown by yesterdays Kami numbers a good showing is posible.

sprite wrote:Hardly. But what I meant was that they just "appeared". There was no introduction (at least on Aris) and all the lore regarding them came afterwards.

AS they are now, yes, not as they were.