Fair enough.grimjim wrote:Use your imagination...
"At the behest of the Intendent myself and my guild have been hunting the Ragus. They have been encroaching on farmland of late and making off with domestic Bodoc."
Excellent advice.grimjim wrote: Create a background history for your character, form some in-character relationships, find out about other people's backgrounds.
Yes you can. What I was implying, perhaps badly is that the choice can be overwhelming. Which follows on to my next point..grimjim wrote: Erm, hardly. It gives you much, much greater scope to be whatever you want to be. You can level skills to create a role for yourself or you can level the skills you deem most useful. IRL people aren't pigeonholed by 'class'.
Everyone IS creating their own character. What i'm saying is that with low content many people are strictly playing their characters as themselves, ie power leveling, etc, etc. Not as in game charracters based on the content (history, racial preduces, etc).grimjim wrote: Roleplay is creating your own character, not fulfilling checkpoints that are set for you.
I doubt this is true. Without pigeon-holing there is no way to either play a character who is sterotypical, nor a character is is not sterotypical, because there is no point of reference, no yard stick for comparison. What tends to happen is lots of people who play exactly as their RL selves, more than if they had a nice stero-typed role to slip into. I know there are those who will RP well regardless, but what i'm saying is that many find it harder without the content.grimjim wrote: Most people find pigeonholing a much greater block to their roleplay. Classes are set and distinct with little to no room for manoeuver and stifle roleplay options, as do racial stereotypes.
More rewarding yes, more possible I dont think so.grimjim wrote:It makes it more possible and more rewarding than simply fulfilling an existing role with points set out by someone else.bobturke wrote: "In summary, high freedom/lack of direction makes getting into RP harder, but not impossible."
I may be wrong. Anyone have any comments?