All,
If I may chime in again and throw in some more comments, in line with what Arc just postedm which I agree fully.
Maybe we can't see the forest for the trees. At first, the present thread and annoucement ought to send the message that the game will remain free at least for one month more. So no mistake, this is indeed something to acknowledge as a complimentary offer for us players - and potential subscribers - from the game operator and something to be grateful for.
The problem is that, in the context of Ryzom past history, some of us may take a excessively defensive posture/stand. This posture risks leading us, somehow unwillingly, to read between the lines of what was supposedly a nice gesture. The text between the aforementioned lines, the subliminal message, seems to be "the game will remain free because we can't setup the billing system fast enough". Does this mean thatm had you been able to, you would have said otherwise?. In other words, past the "free month thing" the apparently crystal-clear statement is that "they" (more about "they" later on) are working on setting up the billing system and that the game, "bureaucracie oblige", will remain free another month (there is no choice either way). Is this month what you (guess)timate will take to finish the paperwork?.
The second message was "it seems that they can only communicate basic details when it concerns the billing system, while there are sooo many unanswered questions and it should be well knonw that us players are willing to commit to the game - including the billing part- if... very big if". We can't be blamed for raising the question whether they are *only* working on the billing system since nothing hints otherwise, while there are outstanding bugs that have been only partially acknowledged and, as far as communication goes, if not ignored, not addressed.
I am afraind that we still (or at least, myself) do not know who Spiderweb (SW, for short) is, which is something about which players may want to know a bit more, even ifit is just, for example, to make an informed choice before committing to 6 or 12 month payment subscriptions.
I find it a bit shocking that until now, there has not been a (sticky) announcement concerning who Spiderweb SARL is. It is not at all trivial, for a new player, to figure out which is the company behind Ryzom. I find it surprising that, in these months, we only got a few posts on the "steps", while most games have a dedicated web page yet the company running the game / service has its own; that same company is "trackable". Yet, unless error on my part, I can't say the same about SW. Looking at the terms of service, it says "Spiderweb SARL", and it seems as if a search and replace was performed on the webpage. The same terms of service mentions Spiderweb website, referring to it as "www.ryzom.com". There is some speculation regarding "ex-Nevrax" employees, old GMs now becoming (supposedly) fully paid employeesm that the same terms of services mention that the contract is governed by French laws and a simple google leads to a Spiderweb SARL in Mulhouse, and there is a
spiderweb-sarl.comdomain...m will this go live anytime soon? etc etc, etc, Is SW a small company? one dev? but this is only speculation. From a marketing point of view, I think this should be answered well before any other question. For now, a huge difference between the VCA and SW is thatm at least, the former were clear about their intentions and would have opened the code.
Another factor to take into account is that, also in the context of Nevrax/Ryzom past history, players today may be far less patient, far less willing to "invest" on the game and to hold (again) on to the greatest future that awaits us if we just stay patient and give the new "team" some time to develop the ideas... so far so good, provided that, at least, these ideas are somehow "known". There is some gray between the "do not make promises that we can't keep" and "tell the players of every single dream the game designer may come up with".... which is, imho, "a generic roadmap", detailing if/when major bugs are fixed, overview of the development plans and, in all "game mid and long term future".
This is exactly what motivated my post. While I appreciate the gesture and the communication, I cannot understand the silence regarding these also fundamental questions.
While it would be great to have a fresh start, and to enjoy new "content" in form of a game patch and a formal release, knowing the roadmap of the game and the identity of the company behind it is a minimum.
Thanks for reading
Ani
ps: Jack, I hope there are not too many big-words that you need to look up...