Ryzom

In the danger of keeping this on-topic, do you know anything about the issues asked by the TS Daestny. I would love to be thrown a bone about it even if it's a scraggly old one

Kodel.

Hi Daestny,

If your still there reading this... any chance you could give someone a nudge for an update?


I reckon alot of the "madness" will go away once we as a community get responses from GF on the status and future of Ryzom.






Many thanks

daestny wrote:In response to your reply:
Bottom line is this: lots of people did a lot of very un nice things. Many people got involved directly and indirectly and did more un nice things. Some of the not nice things will result in varying levels of disciplinary action. So rather than a couple people getting in trouble we end up with several people getting in trouble because they chose to jump in and become vigilantes. This type of scenario is self sustaining until the chain is broken. What Boroshi did was a good faith effort to stop the problem before it got even MORE out of hand. Now its time for the community to take their part of the responsibility and stop the madness.

un-nice things are different from breaking the CoC and NAMING POLICY Rules like the behavior the deliquent showed towards others. With the resulting absence of disciplinary action and the explicity offering a platform (this forum) to the deliquent for his show, i fear that no chain is broken.

pavmelas wrote:un-nice things are different from breaking the CoC and NAMING POLICY Rules like the behavior the deliquent showed towards others. With the resulting absence of disciplinary action and the explicity offering a platform (this forum) to the deliquent for his show, i fear that no chain is broken.

Ok let me spell it out for you since it appears you don't like it when Dae tries to be nice

1. Several people broke the RULES and COC.
2. We won't disclose the disciplinary actions due to policy.
3. 17957.2 vigilantes posting rant's or reposting closed threads or "reminding" the CSR team of the rules doesn't change the facts of the situation. It only creates MORE issues when said vigilantes violate the rules as well.

End of discussion.

OK now I have a plea ...
First I will thanks Daestny for coming in and adding some content to this thread
But then I will ask the forums trolls to stay away...

DO you have more questions to ask Marjo, GF France (nevrax), GF Germany (Head Office) and such, please feel free to input, I may add your question in the OP...
If you have nothing to say except flaming CSR who are players as we are, get the .... away from this thread....
I asked questions to GF because I promissed I will do on the 23rd of August...

Anyone Using this thread to flame another player will be named and shame in another thread...

What we want is an answer: you want to flame?
Use the 30 other thread that have been on lately....

daestny wrote:Ok let me spell it out for you since it appears you don't like it when Dae tries to be nice

1. Several people broke the RULES and COC.
2. We won't disclose the disciplinary actions due to policy.
3. 17957.2 vigilantes posting rant's or reposting closed threads or "reminding" the CSR team of the rules doesn't change the facts of the situation. It only creates MORE issues when said vigilantes violate the rules as well.

End of discussion.

Daestny,


I appologise on behalf of those who have taken you time to dig at an issue which has nothing to do with me or this thread; but at the same time; 3 posts in a single thread from the most offical representive of the game we have seen in a long time, all to caution and disucuss topics outside of the thread.

I beg of anyone at GF, please just give us a response, any response.


Thank you.

a possibility that maybe hasnt been considered is CSRs etc are forbidden from telling you status of game development etc.

viper579 wrote:a possibility that maybe hasnt been considered is CSRs etc are forbidden from telling you status of game development etc.

or know nthg about it...

I'm hoping for some announcement the 16th of september... (Ryzom = 3 years then). If not coming by then, I'm getting some sort of really worried tbh

To the original post.

You say there was (potentials) 14 or more threads that marjo posted in, in july. and 6 or more threads in August. (as im too lazy to add up the posts)

Lets compare to July/august 2006.

In July 2006 Marjo posted in 4 threads, in August she posted in 3.

Relitive to this time last year we are getting AT LEAST double...

Link which is a search of the threads that marjo has posted. in for July/Aug 2006.

My Gosh, you've gotta love mass hysteria.