fiach wrote:Ummm you mentioed ears first
Well to start off, i really wasnt the first one starting about the ears, i used those exact words as a copy....check it if you must.
And rushin seems to be of the clever type
Like i said, i like to poke at people, like rushin demonstrated in an over too obvious way. Did you really think i told those people i had already found the gulatch oil? I had a nice laugh over it, and moved off after hearing a GM shout at them. I had fun.
Now about the thread i started this afternoon. Server was down and i was looking into some old threads. I saw some words coming a tad close (im keeping your words in my vocabulary Fiach) to flaming. It wasnt tho, but close. And i wanted to see if i could get anyone into it by building the steps higher and higher, slowly. Start with a normal opinion, getting a response, flaming just a tiny bit on the response, getting a irritated response back on that one, and so on.
After some time i couldve gotten some of you to call me things you are so eager to avoid. You dont want them into your escape. I dont know why, maybe because you think you're better than the people that use insults to say what they think.
I got this from another thread:
arfindel wrote:Little theory here:
Somebody leaves Ryzom, posts that Ryzom is a bad game, and all the community feels the need to answer him, some to convicne him it's not bad, others to convince him he didn't understand the game. These threads are recurrent.
They always move on the same mechanism:
X leaves
X doesn't only leave but posts that Ryzom is bad.
(A, B, C...N) all play and enjoy Ryzom.
If Ryzom is really bad (A, B, C, ... N) are enjoying a bad game, therefore X is cleverer than them. And that's what his posting implies.
If Ryzom is proven good then X didn't understand the game, or didn't take enough effort to understand and then (A, B,C, ... N) are cleverer than him.
Naturally (A, B,C,... N) feel hurt by the first hypothesis and try to prove it wrong.
But if first hypothesis is wrong then the second one is true which makes (A, B, C...N) be in a superior position.
Leaving is neutral.
Posting "Ryzom is bad. I leave" is a condescendent attitude.
Answers are just symetrical condescendent reaction
Detail 1. Posting "Ryzom is bad. I leave" disregards entirely the feelings of the forums community, has a more or less constient will to hurt.
Detail 2. The more the answer is kind, the more denotes self confidence, the more the answer is aggressive denotes need to convince the author himself of his truth.
Don't worry, Anissa, most people who answered affirmed mostly their devotion to our world rather than their condescendence to X.
After reading this person posting a "i think im very smart now, dont you?" reply, it made me think. You were so eager to avoid it so i tried it. As the clever rushin (i have no idea if he really is, or if it was just a lame guess) stated, i wanted to try a test. It failed, ahwell.
Im glad to have gotten some new info about the game, so thank you all for the replies.
ps. After reading half the post of g00staff, i stopped. Just stopped.
