Ryzom

alyssah wrote:I also think it is discourteous to have your ingame CSR lackeys criticise other gamers posts on your behalf.

Please explain. I fear I've missed something.

aaack wrote:As stated here Lathan has a total of 61 posts on the forum.

The search link in that thread is broken btw - the searchid has expired so will no longer give any results.

Edit: The one you're after is this

Yeah, I was going to remove it and post an alternative method, but as I was editing it xavier locked it

kostika wrote:Please explain. I fear I've missed something.

It was a reference to this

http://www.ryzom.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18674

And I only got a warning email. Also Xavier didn't say if he got warned about his discourtesy. I did not know that any ban would be permanent either.

'You're attacking people (forum posters and CSRs); this isn't appropriate
on the Forum.

Next step is permanent removal of your forum access.

--
Xavier.'

Pity I've unsubbed Xavier.

alyssah wrote:It was a reference to this http://www.ryzom.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18674

I'm afraid I'm not quite sure how that relates to

alyssah wrote:It is becoming more and more obvious that certain gamers are answering questions for you and in doing so showing us who they are.

alyssah wrote:It was a reference to this

http://www.ryzom.com/forum/showthread.php?t=18674

And I only got a warning email. Also Xavier didn't say if he got warned about his discourtesy. I did not know that any ban would be permanent either.

Did you get a warning for a month old post then?

Sorry, I do try to keep up but I'm confused.

You know the old saying Spriteh, 'to each their own'.

kostika wrote:Did you get a warning for a month old post then?

Sorry, I do try to keep up but I'm confused.

No Kos. Sorry I'm confusing you. My CSR comment was made in relation to the post that was a month old. It was closed after a naughty ex CSR tried to explain the agreement they have to keep to. My follow up post was pulled off the forum and disappeared. I took this as proof that some CSRs may be posting favourably on Nevrax's behalf.

I was warned for the discourtesy of attacking the CSRs in the above post and included part of the text of Xavier's email, also above. It quite clearly states that any further breaches will cause my forum access to be removed PERMANENTLY. In Xavier's other comments about access it says account will be suspended. It doesn't say permanently. If anything, I suppose I'm warning the community that it's not a case of being banned for a week or so - it's a permanent ban.

alyssah wrote:No Kos. Sorry I'm confusing you. My CSR comment was made in relation to the post that was a month old. It was closed after a naughty ex CSR tried to explain the agreement they have to keep to. My follow up post was pulled off the forum and disappeared. I took this as proof that some CSRs may be posting favourably on Nevrax's behalf.
<snip>

Aww..okies I understand now. Guess I should try reading forums and work at the same time

And yes that is a fair it on the confusing side. I think maybe a clarification may be needed as a perm ban is a bit of a big step.

kostika wrote:And yes that is a fair it on the confusing side. I think maybe a clarification may be needed as a perm ban is a bit of a big step.

The exact terms I used in the original "Trolls & flames" thread was "an unspecified amount of time". And, true, it means "permanent". I didn't wanted to only ban for a given amount of time and have to start again the month after.

However, I wanted to keep the option of reopening the forum accesses one day, but it depends on how things evolve on the board - thus the 'unspecified'.

--
Xavier.