Page 3 of 4

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 8:19 pm
by beaut666
I like sigs...they can just restrict the size. AND u can always turn them off.

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:06 pm
by sprite
kostika wrote:Second, Nilly, I love you dear, but please explain to me how they'd enforce banner size and dimensions of something that isn't on their server? Maybe not here, but in MSN. But I don't see any way for them to be able to do that. Avatars, yes. Signatures, no.
So you didn't bother to read or just plain ignored the handy link supplied earlier?

I'm feeling generous so here it is again, and I'll even give you the important part...
vBulletin Dev Team wrote:This Hack allows you to controlMaximum Number of Lines
Maximum Font Size
Links to external Websites
BBCodes
Images (max. Number/Width/Height/Filesize)
used in Signatures.
Also the standard vB software (ie what is currently in use) allows you to show/notshow signatures, and even allows you to show/notshow images.

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:59 pm
by dakhound
kostika wrote:First off, this isn't off topic. This directly has to do with these forums and the use of them.
shock horror, these forums are for discussing ryzom not your hate of sigs.

/offtopic

forum description "Come in, pull up a chair, let's discuss all things RYZOM-related"

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 10:09 pm
by grimjim
dakhound wrote:shock horror, these forums are for discussing ryzom not your hate of sigs.

/offtopic

forum description "Come in, pull up a chair, let's discuss all things RYZOM-related"
Is this forum to do with Ryzom?
Do signature files have relevance to our forum experience, on this Ryzom forum?
They do?

There we are then.

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2007 11:55 pm
by kostika
sprite wrote:So you didn't bother to read or just plain ignored the handy link supplied earlier?
I didn't ignore it, I jsut missed it is all. You know it is possible for someone to make a mistake and miss something. You don't have to be snarky. I was honestly asking for an explanation as I didn't know of any way to do it.

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:05 am
by sprite
kostika wrote:I didn't ignore it, I jsut missed it is all. You know it is possible for someone to make a mistake and miss something. You don't have to be snarky. I was honestly asking for an explanation as I didn't know of any way to do it.
Well now you know; changed your mind or still opposed? :)

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:19 am
by kostika
Still opposed. It's nice to know there's a way to do it. But I still like my forums picture-less when it comes to sigs. And I don't want to have to turn them off.

Could we possible kill this thread though? It's 2 years old and half the votes on it are likely to be by people who don't even play anymore.

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:44 am
by bluefve
mikelaw wrote:As a sig maker here :D i wish they would allow them :D
Wow, I thought you were MIA!

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:47 am
by ajsuk
bluefve wrote:Wow, I thought you were MIA!
April 14th, 2005, 12:31 PM :P

Re: To picture or to not picture

Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2007 1:53 am
by bluefve
Yup, thank you Jayce. I realized my mistake when I saw the message about the thread revive :(

But on the note of the topic, I'll take my stand where everyone else seems to. They don't particularly bother me as long as its in a controlled environment.