Re: Faction Nerfs...
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2007 3:31 am
Neutrality as an equal option is strictly a forum driven phenomenon and has zero bases in anything ever written by the developers of this game.
Neutrality in this game is not a choice, it is a lack of a choice, it is the default setting. It is not more honorable, or morally superior to the factions. It is based in a delusional mindset that has nothing to do with the world of Atys. Everything, everything Homins have accomplished since the Kitin squashed the species is directly related to the benevolence/manipulations/whatever of one of the two factions. Homins are completely incapable of survival without them. Not paying at least lip service is suicidal, reckless and perilous.
They do not owe us anything. They do not need us (as far as we know anyway). They leave us, we are extinct.
In short, the neutral argument as I see it is "I'd rather my species be destroyed, then me having to thank or pay any sort of respect to those that keep me, my family, my culture, and everyone else alive."
I suppose there is something moral in that.
Pero
Neutrality in this game is not a choice, it is a lack of a choice, it is the default setting. It is not more honorable, or morally superior to the factions. It is based in a delusional mindset that has nothing to do with the world of Atys. Everything, everything Homins have accomplished since the Kitin squashed the species is directly related to the benevolence/manipulations/whatever of one of the two factions. Homins are completely incapable of survival without them. Not paying at least lip service is suicidal, reckless and perilous.
They do not owe us anything. They do not need us (as far as we know anyway). They leave us, we are extinct.
In short, the neutral argument as I see it is "I'd rather my species be destroyed, then me having to thank or pay any sort of respect to those that keep me, my family, my culture, and everyone else alive."
I suppose there is something moral in that.
Pero