As I said, I quotes Xavier on that... can't be sure he did meant the individual investors would put the same ammount of money as the pledged money on our side, but that's something we all won't know until it's the time, since it would be like telling SOE how much to pay to get rid of us (and if it were the case, they would for sure pay much much more than that.iphdrunk wrote:Should your answers be 100% accurate, and if , as your previous post states, the 3 partner SAS is *in spirit, although not legally* a non-profit organization, then I admit that the two partners giving away 150k Euros (guesstimate) and renouncing to any compensation or profit is altruistic, and I respect that. Other aspects aside, in spirit as in intended, the project has a noble goal: releasing the code in GPL and offer an professional-grade non profit service, but the way it developed left room for lots of questions
Yours,
About why it was necessary to make the SAS... it's mostly to have a solid legal formation when facint the liquidation process, since, for example, we wouldn't be able to keep Jolt's service not being a company (or having one that would on our name). There are other minor issues like the previous one, just to end up requiring those steps were made in order to have chances to "enter" the process