philu wrote:Well you wont mind then if I stick with the opinion I have now formed of you, will you?
(Although I'm open minded enough to change that opinion if I ever meet you.)
Just as I'm entitled to my opinion of the Samsara, so are you entitled to your opinion of me - I don't begrudge anyone that...
philu wrote:Yes you do have a right to your opinion. What you don't have a right to do is make sweeping generalisations about them based on half-formed opinions when you aren't prepared to get to know someone properly.
Hey, I formed my RP opinions of the Samsara based on RP posts that I read...I think that in an RP sense, I can make any kind of generalisations that I like, and until Ma-Duk tells me different, nothing you can say is gonna change that.
Besides the previous link that I posted said it all to me after the "stomp on a kami for dappers" or whatever in that, I was DEFINITELY not going to spend the time getting to know them better.
philu wrote:I've said this already on another thread so I'll be brief. Ouposts are not what was originally promised. I, like others, can remember information from Nevrax that mentioned being able to own an Outpost through diplomatic means not conflict. We also remember talk of Outposts giving much more than they do, more content to them. So if Nevrax had kept their promise, Outposts wouldn't be all about PvP. Nor should they be. Non-PvP players have as much right to new content as everyone else.
OOC: Now that is a different story...TBH, I haven't followed the OP saga from Nevrax too much - all I know is what I see in game, and in game, it's seems to be all about PvP atm...if that changes, great, brilliant- I happen to agree that people that don't want to engage in PvP should be allowed to "legitimately" engage in new content without having to engage in the kind of activity that seems to have spawned both mine and others replies...but until then, at least play by the rules if nothing else...if not, then you reap what you sow...
philu wrote:You are welcome. I don't like to see good people unjustly slagged off.
Never meant to slag anyone off OOC. Thought I was doing it IC in a RP sense based on comments such as...
kostika wrote:False declaring is a valid tactic. You keep each other safe from attacks. Yea others can't declare, but that's the point. Its not about fair. Its about keeping your outpost safe...
