rundll32 wrote:Im not expecting a mechanical change, nor wanting one. The fact is there are pros and cons to gvg and fvf, and there are always going to be people who want one over the other, if the mechanics were the other way around, there would be plenty of people campaigning for the ability to allow allies to help. This is yet another example of you attempting to impose how you wish the game to be played on other people. Riders requested a gvg, good on them. GoJ declined, and they are perfectly within there rights to do so. Maybe you should go and design and play some of your own scenarios, with npcs, that way everyone can play just how you want them to. Until then, stop talking down to me, and stop telling me and other people how to play.
Sure, soon as you stop FORCING other people to play your way.
There are ways to satisfy GvG with smaller alliances.
Hey, I sometimes wish I could 'impose' upon others a different way to play, but I can't, the mechanics don't support enforcement of my play decisions but they do enforce yours.
As to talking down to you sure, as soon as you start showing some manner of conscience or concern for other people.
Perhaps another metaphore might get it through.
Imagine you go to the cinema.
Everyone pays for a ticket to see the film, 'Things Exploding II' or whatever.
You all file in and sit down.
When the film starts, one ****tard starts taking calls on his mobile phone, shouting along, pre-empting parts of the dialogue and telling everyone the ending.
When challenged by another irate moviegoer his excuse is "I paid for my ticket like everyone else, I can watch the bloody film how I want!"
Not acceptable is it?
That help? Any inkling there? Any hint of cognition? A gleam of understanding? A glimmer of conscience?
Or just more 'Lol' and accusing others of the very thing you're actually doing?