Ryzom

Gonna agree on several levels:

1. The patch issues - Players have made efforts to report system data and offer possible reasons as to what maye ba causing the problems. GF action....move to technical section of forum, no input.

2. The forum issues - Threads have been closed and deleted with instruction given that these issues should not be discussed in the forums. However it seems that players have concluded this is the only way to get GF's attention. I have contacted GF directly by e-mail both to report CoC Violations and ask policy questions related to my son's participation in game and have yet to receive a response.

3. The development page hasn't been touched in what 18 months ?

Let me play devil's advocate and list some of the ideas that are probably going thru peep's minds. Has GF given up on Ryzom ? Is GF preparing a new game based upon the RAID engine and using Ryzom and its player base as a testbed for this new game's features (i.e background downloader) ?

jared96 wrote: Let me play devil's advocate and list some of the ideas that are probably going thru peep's minds. Has GF given up on Ryzom ?

yes. even if its not true, assume it at this point.

jared96 wrote:Gonna agree on several levels:

1. The patch issues - Players have made efforts to report system data and offer possible reasons as to what maye ba causing the problems. GF action....move to technical section of forum, no input.

2. The forum issues - Threads have been closed and deleted with instruction given that these issues should not be discussed in the forums. However it seems that players have concluded this is the only way to get GF's attention. I have contacted GF directly by e-mail both to report CoC Violations and ask policy questions related to my son's participation in game and have yet to receive a response.

3. The development page hasn't been touched in what 18 months ?

Let me play devil's advocate and list some of the ideas that are probably going thru peep's minds. Has GF given up on Ryzom ? Is GF preparing a new game based upon the RAID engine and using Ryzom and its player base as a testbed for this new game's features (i.e background downloader) ?

Spot on mate.

Players need feedback, we dont even have senior members of the support team on klients any more, we used to know what was going on even if it was stupidly slow.

Is the plan to reduce cost and just let ryzom as it is at the moment with no prospect of thing improving?

*awaits alot of answer*

Well, saying the dev page hasn't been touched in ages isn't quite true. However, theres definitely been some items on there for months & even years in some cases that havn't been moved, updated or implemented.

ajsuk wrote:"Already had asked me how long lasts it, until Gameforge with the acceptance of "Ryzom" also financially receives itself. That is a cask without ground. One must know at the same time, approximately so appreciates that the Klaus a strange investor like the devil the Weihwasser. If it to pump therefore an investor "allowed" its schnödes money into the geheiligten halls of the Gameforge, the Kacke is steam there at that"

This is what freetranslation spewed out, looks like old news.

*LOOOOL* Where did you dig this out btw?

Correct (non literal) translation:
"I´ve allready asked myself how long it would take until Gameforge, with the takeover of Ryzom, would finacially keel over itself. It´s like a bottomless well.
You´ve got to know that Klaus (I think the writer means Klaas Kersting, GF CEO) does normaly appreciate a foreign investor like the Devil does holy water. So if he "allows" an investor to pump his disdainful money into the hallowed halls of Gameforge, then the ship is allready sinking."

But, to whoever wrote this, how does he know GF that "good" if he even can´t write the Name of thier CEO? *LOL*

Sorry, this is riducolous.

CU
Acridiel

jared96 wrote:Gonna agree on several levels:


2. The forum issues - Threads have been closed and deleted with instruction given that these issues should not be discussed in the forums. However it seems that players have concluded this is the only way to get GF's attention. I have contacted GF directly by e-mail both to report CoC Violations and ask policy questions related to my son's participation in game and have yet to receive a response.

CS issues regarding player Tickets and Investigation of Harassment are NEVER appropriate for the forums. All they lead to is counter harassment and trial by the community vigilantes. The more severe cases require more investigation before actions can be taken, and inflaming the issues by trial by forum only complicates matters by taking time and energy away from the issue at hand by redirecting manpower to deal with the additional fallout generated by 'trial by forum'.

Privacy dictates that we not disclose the results of investigations and the disciplinary actions taken against player accounts. As much as you (the community) would like to know 'the dirt', it is not necessary nor is it the policy of GameForge to disclose this information.

Feel free to PM me with the questions you have regarding how the policies relate to your son.

OMG OMG it's a GM....quick, pin him before he gets away so we can squeeze some answers..hehe j/k

daestny wrote:CS issues regarding player Tickets and Investigation of Harassment are NEVER appropriate for the forums. All they lead to is counter harassment and trial by the community vigilantes. The more severe cases require more investigation before actions can be taken, and inflaming the issues by trial by forum only complicates matters by taking time and energy away from the issue at hand by redirecting manpower to deal with the additional fallout generated by 'trial by forum'.

Privacy dictates that we not disclose the results of investigations and the disciplinary actions taken against player accounts. As much as you (the community) would like to know 'the dirt', it is not necessary nor is it the policy of GameForge to disclose this information.

Feel free to PM me with the questions you have regarding how the policies relate to your son.

having a csr say it was "commendable that you 'owned up'" when that person should of been banned.

Stole from someone else
"CODE OF CONDUCT

1 You may not harass, threaten, embarrass nor discomfort any other players.
2 You may not use any harmful, hateful, abusive, vulgar, defamatory, obscene, racial, ethnically offensive, nor sexually explicit language to any other players or Customer Service Representatives.

COURTESY POLICY
INGAME COURTESY POLICY
You may not harass other players in any form.
You may not disrupt the game experience of another player.
You may not abuse other players or Customer Service Representatives.
You may not operate or be part of a guild or group of players that violates this Courtesy Policy.
You may not take cover under the guise of 'role-playing' to violate any part of the Courtesy Policy.
You may not violate the Code of Conduct.

NAMING POLICY

5. You may not use names that are: rude, racist or ethnically offensive, defamatory or hateful, obscene, profane, sexually explicit, drug references and homonyms of these words, nor names that include common swear words, refer to a part of anatomy.
13. You may not use a name chosen to harm, in any way, or impersonate another Player or a Gameforge France Employee or a member of the Customer Support Team.

That's 10 Violations by my count. "


Off topic i know but i think thats what he was referring to.

slippery wrote:That's 10 Violations by my count.

There is the key that the CSR's have to use common sense in. DT has been mocked by player names for a long time, that's water off a duck's back. It's not rude or anything else, defamatory possibly but no biggie. It's the actions that player may have done, that may be a rule violation easier to pin down... Names have never been taken too harshly and unless vulgar normally only get changed by a CSR. The CSR team doesn't have the time or manpower to spin their wheels chasing down YOUR 10 violations that are not really violations. Forum trials do not make a player guilty... but his/her actions may.

slippery wrote:having a csr say it was "commendable that you 'owned up'" when that person should of been banned.

Stole from someone else
"CODE OF CONDUCT

1 You may not harass, threaten, embarrass nor discomfort any other players.
2 You may not use any harmful, hateful, abusive, vulgar, defamatory, obscene, racial, ethnically offensive, nor sexually explicit language to any other players or Customer Service Representatives.

COURTESY POLICY
INGAME COURTESY POLICY
You may not harass other players in any form.
You may not disrupt the game experience of another player.
You may not abuse other players or Customer Service Representatives.
You may not operate or be part of a guild or group of players that violates this Courtesy Policy.
You may not take cover under the guise of 'role-playing' to violate any part of the Courtesy Policy.
You may not violate the Code of Conduct.

NAMING POLICY

5. You may not use names that are: rude, racist or ethnically offensive, defamatory or hateful, obscene, profane, sexually explicit, drug references and homonyms of these words, nor names that include common swear words, refer to a part of anatomy.
13. You may not use a name chosen to harm, in any way, or impersonate another Player or a Gameforge France Employee or a member of the Customer Support Team.

That's 10 Violations by my count. "


Off topic i know but i think thats what he was referring to.

In response to your reply:

The reason Boroshi chose to lock the thread rather than just delete it was based upon the fact that there had already been several threads locked and or deleted along with PM s sent to the appropriate people regarding the issue.

I will not disclose the status of the support incident as per policy.

Realize that in a perfect world we would never have issues like that, but since we do not live in a perfect world we have to deal with such problems. Boroshi chose to show some CM discretion in allowing the post to remain up but locked in the hopes that it would make people understand WHY the other posts were locked. Unfortunately it seems that his choice of words was taken to mean something more than the intent. Ironically, the whole Community OP/harassment/forum flamewar cycle we have gone through this past several days was a result of pretty much the same thing.

Bottom line is this: lots of people did a lot of very un nice things. Many people got involved directly and indirectly and did more un nice things. Some of the not nice things will result in varying levels of disciplinary action. So rather than a couple people getting in trouble we end up with several people getting in trouble because they chose to jump in and become vigilantes. This type of scenario is self sustaining until the chain is broken. What Boroshi did was a good faith effort to stop the problem before it got even MORE out of hand. Now its time for the community to take their part of the responsibility and stop the madness.