Ryzom

leftover function of the original GvG setup of outposts .

adds to bug list

why its even there i don't really know as its open to abuse which thankfully has not been the case so far.

Im really confused about the whole neutral guilds picking sides thing

wardone wrote:leftover function of the original GvG setup of outposts .

adds to bug list

why its even there i don't really know as its open to abuse which thankfully has not been the case so far.

I think that it is quite right for the Guild Leader (from either side) to ban individual homins, to stop spying. But that a banning of a guild then affects both sides needs to be looked at again.

amitst wrote:Im really confused about the whole neutral guilds picking sides thing

you mix faction with outpost war. cant blame you because how alliances are formed (guilds with similar interest/same land/faction.. unthinkable reason, i know), it may seem that way. also they way ppl are talking "kami is attacking, kara is defending", does not help it either.

blaah wrote:you mix faction with outpost war. cant blame you because how alliances are formed (guilds with similar interest/same land/faction.. unthinkable reason, i know), it may seem that way. also they way ppl are talking "kami is attacking, kara is defending", does not help it either.

Well.. as in RL, there are a main tendecy, with a lot of connotations and exceptions. Personally, I like that way, is very realistic to me.

andypur1 wrote:quite right for the Guild Leader (from either side) to ban individual homins, to stop spying.

I don't understand the spying idea... you can be there as neutral, reading around... the team channels are blocked to teams, and the faction channel, to faction.

No need to be tagged as the opposite band for spying, but I'm a bit confused with this. Am I wrong?

yes you are Pm me I will explain why

At Op battles these "spies" in enemy midst are extremely harmful mate...

mithur wrote:Well.. as in RL, there are a main tendecy, with a lot of connotations and exceptions. Personally, I like that way, is very realistic to me.



I don't understand the spying idea... you can be there as neutral, reading around... the team channels are blocked to teams, and the faction channel, to faction.

No need to be tagged as the opposite band for spying, but I'm a bit confused with this. Am I wrong?

Precisely because you could be in a team and therefore getting the inside information

The neutral spies are also a problem, but less so, as they are obviously there on the map and unlikely to be teamed for the side that they are spying against

One of MoMs HOs decided to show at this battle how much she personally appreciated the manners of a certain member of our alliance. Due to an unforeseen glitch in the banning mechanisms of OP battles, this resulted in a larger group of attackers being banned and therefore a major advantage for our opponents side.
MoM wishes to apologize to all Kamis and fighters on attacking side for this! It was neither intended nor planned.

Kommisar, it is nice to see that Karas side aknowledge we did them a favor, and i would never dare to insult a chivalrous Matisian guild like OotN by not offering a chance to return it. In fact, it would be downright rude!
I'll keep ya guys informed when we plan to attack a KA (as in Kara) outpost...

martl wrote:i would never dare to insult a chivalrous Matisian guild like OotN by not offering a chance to return it. In fact, it would be downright rude!

The favour already got returned

Ask kye if you need an explanation

sprite wrote:The favour already got returned

Ask kye if you need an explanation

feel free to elaborate spriteh, i think informing valko of omegav's rouge attacker mearly leveled the playing field somewhat, after all it was not us who started banning guilds from the battle.