Ryzom

tyggy wrote:I wonder if they will ever clue in to the fact that if they keep going like this, most people will just decide that the OP aspect is not worth the headache and leave these two guilds to play with themselves with regards to PvP....?

First question to the two of you that are objecting:

Do you play on Cho?

I have been told there is a hard limit on Outpost. (9 Max)

EoA have won our outpost fairly and we expect to be challanged for them. In fact we have already been declared on once by another guild.

I notice you attack multi-outpost owning guilds, but support the single outpost owning guild. Is it you veiw that one guild should own only one OP?

I notice that the Tryker ql50 hasn't yet been contested.

You make your pointed comments at us, yet there appears there is only 3 guilds at them moment who are interested in taking them. I know that this will soon change as the last outpost to fall required more than one guild to do it, so I expect some favors will be returned to the assisting guilds.

Do you even play on Cho?

Who said anything about PvP? We're just getting the OP's from the NPC's.

If you don't play on Cho, then kindly keep your comments for the Ari crowd.

Cheers.

borg9 wrote:In fact we have already been declared on once by another guild.

Neun, i hope you realise this was a mistake and non of us actually attacked your OP!

/huggles

drcole22 wrote:Neun, i hope you realise this was a mistake and non of us actually attacked your OP!

/huggles

Aww, and there was me looking forward to a good show down. btw we had a great boss hunt while we waited

One of my personal dreams (shared by some, but not all of the guild) That the outpost are actually contested regularly.

I personally have been against EoA forming an alliances with other guilds. Trade for profit is ok, but my biggest fear is a repeat of any form of 'K' Alliance.

In a Kami vs Karavan battle, I will stand by anyone who follows the Kami, but on a day to day basis, I see anyone without Elementals of Atys above their head as a rival (not enemy). I am not fanatical to the point of a no rez policy, unless we are under attack.

I am here for PvP, I am not afraid to lose, I will do everything I can to win for the honour of my guild.

I play by the CoC and rules put in place by Nevrax. Cho has no 'fluffy' history! Cho is Ryzom, not Saga of Ryzom.

I like pie!

I would agree with the posters previously asking for only people who play on cho to comment on the state of OPs within Cho. Should EoA not take an OP until we are able to take a lvl 250 OP?
Or perhaps we should leave all OPs in the hands of marauding tribes because its not fair to take an OP that another guild may want 6 months down the line.
Cho is a chance for a fresh start, with all the rules laid out from the beginning. I for one am going to play by the game mechanics now in place.
Ideally, the guilds on cho will all start to go for OPs and we can have some fun with PvP.
In relation to creating a bad community, I think the people who dont even play on Cho and have derailed this thread are a shining example of how you dont need 'mega guilds' to create a bad atmosphere.
I also wish what you say about the tells over showing up at an OP battle isnt true as i dont like the idea of that one little bit. While I dont wish to see alliances on Cho, if you play within the game mechanics, you should be able to do as you please and take the consequences good or bad.

totnkopf wrote:a guildee is swarmed with tells from the other mega-guild wanting to know why were're helping the other mega-guild. There were offers to pay us to go away before the more interesting tells started up...

Hmmmmm.....nasty tactics going on?

drcole22 wrote:Hmmmmm.....nasty tactics going on?

not particularly... just people flipping out over nothing.

totnkopf wrote:not particularly... just people flipping out over nothing.

Silly people. 'tis a game!

no, really, I really like pie