The new site looks great, but it it's definitely info overload - granted there is a lot to learn about Ryzom, but if possible it needs to be tidied away under meaningful headings
(I know this is tricky from experience).
As far as resolutions go, please don't redesign the page for 800x600 viewing - 1024x768 is the minimum a web developer should design for - pages that actually fit in 800x600 look horrible, and *always* create vast vertical scrolling if they contain a fair amount of information. Apologies to people running 800x600 - you really need to move up. If you're running a Palmtop or similar, then you should expect the majority of info websites to require scrolling anyway, and possibly both directions. Palmtops and similar are not designed for viewing large documents. If you have a machine capable of higher res but you're monitor is limiting it, you need to pawn a family member and get a new monitor
If you have a machine that's *not* capable of higher, then read the website on the machine that runs Ryzom - because I can't think of another reason you have only 800x600, and if you're running Ryzom that particular machine (video card etc.) *must* be capable of at least 1024x768
Bottom line - blog sites can be any size you like, sites packed with info deserved to be designed with 1024x768 as a minimum. If possible, provide sites for 'mobile' users seperately - then the people stuck at 800x600 for other reasons can also view the site properly. Whichever way you design a page, if it contains a fair amount of info, it will have to scroll - and not all designs work well in avoiding horizontal scroll - the more you squash content horizontally the more it has to expand vertically, and that really achieves very little - except making the site horrible for 75% of it's visitors.
It may be worth squishing the homepage, and using a different template for the rest - but I don't favour that approach, because it's inconsistent for the visitor. First impressions are important, second impressions are equally important if you want to get people interested.
People may run 800x600 for games, but if that's their Desktop resolution too, something is very wrong, or they're using a Palmtop
I agree with Jayce - GIF is not the best way to show a movie at all. It creates two of my pet hates as a programmer - the never-gets-to-100% progress bar for loading the page, and the 'app busy' small egg timer in Firefox, even when focused on another tab that isn't loading. Being a web developer I know what's going on - other visitors will be wondering why the page hasn't finished loading, and never does. Flash is definitely preferable here (file size/quality should still be good), what's more important is a *way to stop the movie*
Also, based on experience, the movie is *much* longer than most homepage movies - they tend to be maybe 10-30 seconds, so making the movie link to another longer movie on a different page (or several movies) would be better.
I'm not sure about the 'top bar' containing the links and sever status. Again linked to info overload, it gives the feeling of 'stuff to click everywhere' to the visitor, and that's best avoided - at least on the home page. A website should preferably form a 'pyramid' heirarchy of pages, as closely as possible. When you have a huge number of links on the homepage, this means most of your content is directly underneath on the next 'level' of the heirarchy - it's nice for people to have lots of content to see, but you don't need it all accessible from the beginning. Strong categorisation of info helps the user, 50+ links on a single page does not